Skip to content

Conversation

ChaiTRex
Copy link
Contributor

@ChaiTRex ChaiTRex commented May 16, 2025

Update IDEs to use rustfmt 2024, fix Zed settings

  • Update IDE rust-analyzer settings to use 2024 rather than 2021.
  • Fix Zed settings by removing ${workspaceFolder}/ from paths.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 16, 2025

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) labels May 16, 2025
@ChaiTRex
Copy link
Contributor Author

Found a bug in the Zed IDE settings that prevents autoformatting. Will push in a few moments.

- Update IDE `rust-analyzer` settings to use 2024 rather than 2021.
- Fix Zed settings by removing `${workspaceFolder}/` from paths.
@ChaiTRex ChaiTRex changed the title Update IDE rust-analyzer settings to rustfmt 2024 Update IDEs to use rustfmt 2024, fix Zed settings May 16, 2025
@ChaiTRex
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, fixed.

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 23, 2025

📌 Commit a6bf524 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 23, 2025
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request May 23, 2025
…lacrum

Update IDEs to use rustfmt 2024, fix Zed settings

Update IDEs to use rustfmt 2024, fix Zed settings

- Update IDE `rust-analyzer` settings to use 2024 rather than 2021.
- Fix Zed settings by removing `${workspaceFolder}/` from paths.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request May 23, 2025
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#136400 (Improve handling of rustdoc lints when used with raw doc fragments.)
 - rust-lang#140967 (Async drop poll shim for error dropee generates noop body)
 - rust-lang#141019 (Update std doctests for android)
 - rust-lang#141062 (Update IDEs to use rustfmt 2024, fix Zed settings)
 - rust-lang#141109 (discuss deadlocks in the std::io::pipe() example)
 - rust-lang#141126 (rustdoc JSON: Don't apply `#[repr]` privacy heuristics)
 - rust-lang#141376 (Rename `kw::Empty` as `sym::empty`.)
 - rust-lang#141383 (Miri subtree update)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

Kobzol commented May 23, 2025

@bors p=101

Congratulations, this PR won the lottery and it will jump ahead in the queue to try auto builds running on rust-lang/rust (we're migrating off the rust-lang-ci/rust repository).

@Kobzol
Copy link
Member

Kobzol commented May 23, 2025

@bors r=Mark-Simulacrum

Trying to get homu to refresh this PR.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 23, 2025

💡 This pull request was already approved, no need to approve it again.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 23, 2025

📌 Commit a6bf524 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 23, 2025

⌛ Testing commit a6bf524 with merge 163cb4e...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 23, 2025

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 163cb4e to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 23, 2025
@bors bors merged commit 163cb4e into rust-lang:master May 23, 2025
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone May 23, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 52bf0cf (parent) -> 163cb4e (this PR)

Test differences

No test diffs found

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard 163cb4ea3f0ae3bc7921cc259a08a7bf92e73ee6 --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. x86_64-apple-1: 6400.5s -> 10951.4s (71.1%)
  2. dist-aarch64-linux: 7825.4s -> 5615.4s (-28.2%)
  3. dist-apple-various: 7002.1s -> 5421.2s (-22.6%)
  4. dist-aarch64-apple: 5338.5s -> 6107.0s (14.4%)
  5. dist-aarch64-msvc: 9669.4s -> 8661.0s (-10.4%)
  6. dist-x86_64-apple: 9675.2s -> 8739.4s (-9.7%)
  7. i686-gnu-nopt-1: 8337.2s -> 9113.2s (9.3%)
  8. mingw-check: 1240.0s -> 1349.7s (8.8%)
  9. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 2772.6s -> 2531.8s (-8.7%)
  10. x86_64-gnu-llvm-19-3: 6873.7s -> 7386.2s (7.5%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (163cb4e): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.3% [0.3%, 0.3%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 2.4%, secondary -4.5%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
4.4% [1.9%, 6.8%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.5% [-1.5%, -1.5%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-4.5% [-7.0%, -2.0%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) 2.4% [-1.5%, 6.8%] 3

Cycles

Results (secondary 2.2%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.2% [2.1%, 2.4%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 777.568s -> 776.992s (-0.07%)
Artifact size: 365.56 MiB -> 365.49 MiB (-0.02%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants