Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
36 changes: 36 additions & 0 deletions .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/new_spec.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
<!-- Thanks for proposing a new SPEC! Make sure your PR title is descriptive and short. -->

## Attestation

- [ ] I have read and understood the [SPEC Purpose and Process](https://scientific-python.org/specs/purpose-and-process/) guidelines

## Description

<!--- Please summarize the purpose of this new SPEC, in 1-3 sentences. -->

## Link to SPEC Committee's "viability" discussion thread (required)

<!--
Insert a link to this proposal's initial viability discussion thread in
https://discuss.scientific-python.org/c/specs/ideas
-->

## Link to "public comments" discussion thread (required)

<!--
insert a link to this proposal's community-wide discussion thread in
https://discuss.scientific-python.org/c/specs/web-comments
-->
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This only appears once the SPEC PR has been merged.

Suggested change
## Link to "public comments" discussion thread (required)
<!--
insert a link to this proposal's community-wide discussion thread in
https://discuss.scientific-python.org/c/specs/web-comments
-->

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

while the link is incorrect, isn't the assumption here is that there is already a discourse thread about a SPEC topic prior opening a PR with the SPEC text?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We haven't had a requirement for public comments on the forum; public comments come in on the GH PR, typically.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(And, once published, they can comment on the SPEC itself directly from the website.)


## Description of (or link to) exploratory discussions/POCs (optional)

<!--
SPEC guidelines suggest a first step of one of the following:

1. discuss the idea with at least one project in the ecosystem,
1. discuss the idea with at least one other member of the ecosystem, or
1. create a minimal, proof of concept (POC) prototype.

(see https://scientific-python.org/specs/purpose-and-process/#new-spec-proposals).
In this field, include a description of those preliminary steps and/or links to public discussions or POCs.
-->
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions .github/pull_request_template.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
If you are opening this PR to propose a new SPEC, please go to the `Preview` tab,
then [click here for the new SPEC template](?expand=1&template=new_spec.md).
Otherwise, delete this text and proceed with your PR as normal.