Refactor CF E2E Tests to use Playwright APIs and replace custom promise approach

[LittorWired]

Description

Create new utilities for e2e tests in the internal/e2e-client package to rewrite custom promise-based tests to use the Playwright wrapper utilities.

Type of change

• Internal refactoring
• Bug fix (bugfix - non-breaking)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Code snippets

In case of new feature or breaking changes, please include code snippets.

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 94be26a

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[jpsantosbh]

Should we test for more specific object properties?
Something that could assert that the object is a real instance of what we expect.

[LittorWired]

Good idea. Updated as follows

    await test.step('sanity check - call object, call session and page are set', async () => {
      expect(callObj.getProperty('on')).toBeDefined()
      expect(callObj.getProperty('audioMute')).toBeDefined()
      expect(callObj.getProperty('leave')).toBeDefined()
      expect(callSession).toHaveProperty('room_session')
      expect(callSession).toHaveProperty('member_id')
      expect(page.goto).toBeDefined()
      expect(page.evaluate).toBeDefined()
      expect(page.waitForSelector).toBeDefined()
    })

[jpsantosbh]

I like this better than using Promise.all

[jpsantosbh]

The timeout started earlier, right? Could that be a problem?

[LittorWired]

@iAmmar7 also raised this point. Yes, it could be a problem that the timeout already started if the timeout is a very small number or there is a lot of "waiting" somehow. I think in most cases it won't be a problem. We should keep this in mind though and maybe think of a solution.

[claude]

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

---

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this pull request that refactors CF E2E Tests to use Playwright APIs. Here's my review progress:

Todo List:

• Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
• Review the overall refactoring approach and architecture
• Analyze new utility functions (expectPageEvalToPass, waitForFunction, etc.)
• Review test file changes (videoRoom.spec.ts)
• Check the new test file (utils.spec.ts)
• Investigate potential causes of CI failures mentioned in comments
• Review code quality, performance, and security considerations
• Provide comprehensive feedback and recommendations

Comprehensive Code Review

Overall Assessment: ✅ Good Refactoring with Some Concerns

This PR successfully refactors E2E tests from a custom promise-based approach to using Playwright's native utilities. The refactoring improves test reliability and maintainability, but there are several important issues to address.

---

🎯 Code Quality & Best Practices

✅ Strengths:

1. Good abstraction: The new utilities like expectPageEvalToPass() and waitForFunction() provide clean abstractions over Playwright APIs
2. Comprehensive testing: The new utils.spec.ts file includes thorough tests for the utility functions
3. Type safety: Proper TypeScript generic support in utilities like waitForFunction<TArg, TResult>()
4. Consistent patterns: The refactored tests follow consistent patterns for event handling and assertions

⚠️ Areas for Improvement:

1. Function Signature Inconsistency (utils.spec.ts:218-250)

// Inconsistent parameter structure
const result = await expectPageEvalToPass(page, {
  evaluateFn: () => true,
  messageAssert: 'pass - resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
  messageError: 'error - should resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
})

The test uses messageAssert and messageError parameters, but the actual function signature uses message and assertionFn. This suggests either incorrect tests or API inconsistency.

2. TODO Comments Need Attention (utils.ts:120, 142, 220, etc.)
Multiple functions are marked with TODO comments for removal. These should be cleaned up or the TODOs should be converted to tickets.

---

🐛 Potential Bugs & Issues

Critical Issues:

1. CI Failures Mentioned in Comments
The maintainers report that integrating these utilities into e2e-js caused all tests to fail. Based on my analysis, this could be due to:

• Assertion timing: The new expectPageEvalToPass function has different default timeouts (10 seconds) which might be causing test timing issues
• JSHandle serialization: The use of JSHandle<CallSession> (videoRoom.spec.ts:22) might not serialize properly across different test environments
• Default assertion behavior: The utilities include default assertions that might conflict with existing test patterns

2. Type Safety Issues (utils.ts:472-538)

export const dialAddress = <TReturn = any>(
  page: Page,
  params: DialAddressParams = {
    // ... params
  }
) => {
  // ... implementation
}

The TReturn = any default type defeats the purpose of generics and could hide type errors.

3. Error Handling Inconsistencies (utils.ts:1891-1898)

} catch (error) {
  if (options?.message) {
    throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${options.message} `)
  } else {
    throw new Error('waitForFunction:', error) // This will result in "[object Object]"
  }
}

The error handling doesn't properly format the error object when no custom message is provided.

Medium Priority Issues:

4. JSHandle Memory Leaks (videoRoom.spec.ts:22, 64-70)

let callObj = {} as JSHandle<CallSession>
// ... later
callObj = await waitForFunction(page, () => {
  if (window._callObj) {
    return window._callObj
  }
})

JSHandles need to be properly disposed to prevent memory leaks, but there's no cleanup in the test teardown.

5. Race Conditions (videoRoom.spec.ts:152-154)

await audioMuteSelf
await memberUpdatedMuted
await memberUpdatedMutedEvent

Sequential awaiting instead of Promise.all() might create race conditions where events fire before listeners are set up.

---

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Polling Intervals
The utilities default to long polling intervals (10 seconds) to avoid excessive polling, which is good. However:

• Some tests might need shorter intervals for responsiveness
• Consider making intervals more configurable per test case

2. Memory Usage

• JSHandle objects can consume significant memory if not disposed properly
• The refactored tests create more JSHandle objects than before

---

🔒 Security Concerns

Low Risk Overall - No significant security issues found:

• Environment variables are properly handled
• No sensitive data exposure in tests
• API tokens use proper encoding

---

📊 Test Coverage

✅ Strengths:

• Comprehensive unit tests for new utilities in utils.spec.ts
• Good coverage of edge cases (timeouts, errors, special characters)

⚠️ Gaps:

• Missing tests for waitForFunction (marked as TODO)
• Incomplete tests for expectPageEvalToPass error scenarios
• No integration tests showing the new pattern working with actual CF calls

---

🚀 Recommendations

High Priority:

1. Fix the CI integration issues: The utilities should work seamlessly when copied to e2e-js

   • Review timeout configurations and ensure they match expectations
   • Test the utilities in isolation in the e2e-js environment
   • Consider making default assertions optional

2. Address JSHandle lifecycle management:

   // Add proper cleanup
   test.afterEach(async () => {
     if (callObj) {
       await callObj.dispose()
     }
   })

3. Fix error handling in waitForFunction:

   } else {
     throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`)
   }

Medium Priority:

4. Improve type safety: Replace any types with proper generic constraints
5. Complete the TODO tests: Implement missing test cases for waitForFunction
6. Clean up unused utilities: Address all TODO comments about removing unused functions

Low Priority:

7. Consider adding retry logic: For flaky operations that might benefit from retries
8. Documentation: Add JSDoc comments to the new utility functions

---

🎭 Final Verdict

This is a solid refactoring that moves in the right direction toward using Playwright's native APIs. The code quality is generally good, and the approach is sound. However, the CI integration issues reported by maintainers need to be resolved before merging.

Recommendation: Request Changes - Address the critical CI issues and JSHandle lifecycle management before approving.

The refactoring shows good engineering practices and will improve test maintainability once the integration issues are resolved.

[claude]

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

---

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this pull request that refactors CF E2E Tests to use Playwright APIs. Here's my review progress:

Todo List:

• Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
• Review the overall refactoring approach and architecture
• Analyze new utility functions (expectPageEvalToPass, waitForFunction, etc.)
• Review test file changes (videoRoom.spec.ts)
• Check the new test file (utils.spec.ts)
• Investigate potential causes of CI failures mentioned in comments
• Review code quality, performance, and security considerations
• Provide comprehensive feedback and recommendations

Comprehensive Code Review

Overall Assessment: ✅ Good Refactoring with Some Concerns

This PR successfully refactors E2E tests from a custom promise-based approach to using Playwright's native utilities. The refactoring improves test reliability and maintainability, but there are several important issues to address.

---

🎯 Code Quality & Best Practices

✅ Strengths:

1. Good abstraction: The new utilities like expectPageEvalToPass() and waitForFunction() provide clean abstractions over Playwright APIs
2. Comprehensive testing: The new utils.spec.ts file includes thorough tests for the utility functions
3. Type safety: Proper TypeScript generic support in utilities like waitForFunction<TArg, TResult>()
4. Consistent patterns: The refactored tests follow consistent patterns for event handling and assertions

⚠️ Areas for Improvement:

1. Function Signature Inconsistency (utils.spec.ts:218-250)

// Inconsistent parameter structure
const result = await expectPageEvalToPass(page, {
  evaluateFn: () => true,
  messageAssert: 'pass - resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
  messageError: 'error - should resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
})

The test uses messageAssert and messageError parameters, but the actual function signature uses message and assertionFn. This suggests either incorrect tests or API inconsistency.

2. TODO Comments Need Attention (utils.ts:120, 142, 220, etc.)
Multiple functions are marked with TODO comments for removal. These should be cleaned up or the TODOs should be converted to tickets.

---

🐛 Potential Bugs & Issues

Critical Issues:

1. CI Failures Mentioned in Comments
The maintainers report that integrating these utilities into e2e-js caused all tests to fail. Based on my analysis, this could be due to:

• Assertion timing: The new expectPageEvalToPass function has different default timeouts (10 seconds) which might be causing test timing issues
• JSHandle serialization: The use of JSHandle<CallSession> (videoRoom.spec.ts:22) might not serialize properly across different test environments
• Default assertion behavior: The utilities include default assertions that might conflict with existing test patterns

2. Type Safety Issues (utils.ts:472-538)

export const dialAddress = <TReturn = any>(
  page: Page,
  params: DialAddressParams = {
    // ... params
  }
) => {
  // ... implementation
}

The TReturn = any default type defeats the purpose of generics and could hide type errors.

3. Error Handling Inconsistencies (utils.ts:1891-1898)

} catch (error) {
  if (options?.message) {
    throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${options.message} `)
  } else {
    throw new Error('waitForFunction:', error) // This will result in "[object Object]"
  }
}

The error handling doesn't properly format the error object when no custom message is provided.

Medium Priority Issues:

4. JSHandle Memory Leaks (videoRoom.spec.ts:22, 64-70)

let callObj = {} as JSHandle<CallSession>
// ... later
callObj = await waitForFunction(page, () => {
  if (window._callObj) {
    return window._callObj
  }
})

JSHandles need to be properly disposed to prevent memory leaks, but there's no cleanup in the test teardown.

5. Race Conditions (videoRoom.spec.ts:152-154)

await audioMuteSelf
await memberUpdatedMuted
await memberUpdatedMutedEvent

Sequential awaiting instead of Promise.all() might create race conditions where events fire before listeners are set up.

---

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Polling Intervals
The utilities default to long polling intervals (10 seconds) to avoid excessive polling, which is good. However:

• Some tests might need shorter intervals for responsiveness
• Consider making intervals more configurable per test case

2. Memory Usage

• JSHandle objects can consume significant memory if not disposed properly
• The refactored tests create more JSHandle objects than before

---

🔒 Security Concerns

Low Risk Overall - No significant security issues found:

• Environment variables are properly handled
• No sensitive data exposure in tests
• API tokens use proper encoding

---

📊 Test Coverage

✅ Strengths:

• Comprehensive unit tests for new utilities in utils.spec.ts
• Good coverage of edge cases (timeouts, errors, special characters)

⚠️ Gaps:

• Missing tests for waitForFunction (marked as TODO)
• Incomplete tests for expectPageEvalToPass error scenarios
• No integration tests showing the new pattern working with actual CF calls

---

🚀 Recommendations

High Priority:

1. Fix the CI integration issues: The utilities should work seamlessly when copied to e2e-js

   • Review timeout configurations and ensure they match expectations
   • Test the utilities in isolation in the e2e-js environment
   • Consider making default assertions optional

2. Address JSHandle lifecycle management:

   // Add proper cleanup
   test.afterEach(async () => {
     if (callObj) {
       await callObj.dispose()
     }
   })

3. Fix error handling in waitForFunction:

   } else {
     throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`)
   }

Medium Priority:

4. Improve type safety: Replace any types with proper generic constraints
5. Complete the TODO tests: Implement missing test cases for waitForFunction
6. Clean up unused utilities: Address all TODO comments about removing unused functions

Low Priority:

7. Consider adding retry logic: For flaky operations that might benefit from retries
8. Documentation: Add JSDoc comments to the new utility functions

---

🎭 Final Verdict

This is a solid refactoring that moves in the right direction toward using Playwright's native APIs. The code quality is generally good, and the approach is sound. However, the CI integration issues reported by maintainers need to be resolved before merging.

Recommendation: Request Changes - Address the critical CI issues and JSHandle lifecycle management before approving.

The refactoring shows good engineering practices and will improve test maintainability once the integration issues are resolved.

[claude]

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

---

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this pull request that refactors CF E2E Tests to use Playwright APIs. Here's my review progress:

Todo List:

• Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
• Review the overall refactoring approach and architecture
• Analyze new utility functions (expectPageEvalToPass, waitForFunction, etc.)
• Review test file changes (videoRoom.spec.ts)
• Check the new test file (utils.spec.ts)
• Investigate potential causes of CI failures mentioned in comments
• Review code quality, performance, and security considerations
• Provide comprehensive feedback and recommendations

Comprehensive Code Review

Overall Assessment: ✅ Good Refactoring with Some Concerns

This PR successfully refactors E2E tests from a custom promise-based approach to using Playwright's native utilities. The refactoring improves test reliability and maintainability, but there are several important issues to address.

---

🎯 Code Quality & Best Practices

✅ Strengths:

1. Good abstraction: The new utilities like expectPageEvalToPass() and waitForFunction() provide clean abstractions over Playwright APIs
2. Comprehensive testing: The new utils.spec.ts file includes thorough tests for the utility functions
3. Type safety: Proper TypeScript generic support in utilities like waitForFunction<TArg, TResult>()
4. Consistent patterns: The refactored tests follow consistent patterns for event handling and assertions

⚠️ Areas for Improvement:

1. Function Signature Inconsistency (utils.spec.ts:218-250)

// Inconsistent parameter structure
const result = await expectPageEvalToPass(page, {
  evaluateFn: () => true,
  messageAssert: 'pass - resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
  messageError: 'error - should resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
})

The test uses messageAssert and messageError parameters, but the actual function signature uses message and assertionFn. This suggests either incorrect tests or API inconsistency.

2. TODO Comments Need Attention (utils.ts:120, 142, 220, etc.)
Multiple functions are marked with TODO comments for removal. These should be cleaned up or the TODOs should be converted to tickets.

---

🐛 Potential Bugs & Issues

Critical Issues:

1. CI Failures Mentioned in Comments
The maintainers report that integrating these utilities into e2e-js caused all tests to fail. Based on my analysis, this could be due to:

• Assertion timing: The new expectPageEvalToPass function has different default timeouts (10 seconds) which might be causing test timing issues
• JSHandle serialization: The use of JSHandle<CallSession> (videoRoom.spec.ts:22) might not serialize properly across different test environments
• Default assertion behavior: The utilities include default assertions that might conflict with existing test patterns

2. Type Safety Issues (utils.ts:472-538)

export const dialAddress = <TReturn = any>(
  page: Page,
  params: DialAddressParams = {
    // ... params
  }
) => {
  // ... implementation
}

The TReturn = any default type defeats the purpose of generics and could hide type errors.

3. Error Handling Inconsistencies (utils.ts:1891-1898)

} catch (error) {
  if (options?.message) {
    throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${options.message} `)
  } else {
    throw new Error('waitForFunction:', error) // This will result in "[object Object]"
  }
}

The error handling doesn't properly format the error object when no custom message is provided.

Medium Priority Issues:

4. JSHandle Memory Leaks (videoRoom.spec.ts:22, 64-70)

let callObj = {} as JSHandle<CallSession>
// ... later
callObj = await waitForFunction(page, () => {
  if (window._callObj) {
    return window._callObj
  }
})

JSHandles need to be properly disposed to prevent memory leaks, but there's no cleanup in the test teardown.

5. Race Conditions (videoRoom.spec.ts:152-154)

await audioMuteSelf
await memberUpdatedMuted
await memberUpdatedMutedEvent

Sequential awaiting instead of Promise.all() might create race conditions where events fire before listeners are set up.

---

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Polling Intervals
The utilities default to long polling intervals (10 seconds) to avoid excessive polling, which is good. However:

• Some tests might need shorter intervals for responsiveness
• Consider making intervals more configurable per test case

2. Memory Usage

• JSHandle objects can consume significant memory if not disposed properly
• The refactored tests create more JSHandle objects than before

---

🔒 Security Concerns

Low Risk Overall - No significant security issues found:

• Environment variables are properly handled
• No sensitive data exposure in tests
• API tokens use proper encoding

---

📊 Test Coverage

✅ Strengths:

• Comprehensive unit tests for new utilities in utils.spec.ts
• Good coverage of edge cases (timeouts, errors, special characters)

⚠️ Gaps:

• Missing tests for waitForFunction (marked as TODO)
• Incomplete tests for expectPageEvalToPass error scenarios
• No integration tests showing the new pattern working with actual CF calls

---

🚀 Recommendations

High Priority:

1. Fix the CI integration issues: The utilities should work seamlessly when copied to e2e-js

   • Review timeout configurations and ensure they match expectations
   • Test the utilities in isolation in the e2e-js environment
   • Consider making default assertions optional

2. Address JSHandle lifecycle management:

   // Add proper cleanup
   test.afterEach(async () => {
     if (callObj) {
       await callObj.dispose()
     }
   })

3. Fix error handling in waitForFunction:

   } else {
     throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`)
   }

Medium Priority:

4. Improve type safety: Replace any types with proper generic constraints
5. Complete the TODO tests: Implement missing test cases for waitForFunction
6. Clean up unused utilities: Address all TODO comments about removing unused functions

Low Priority:

7. Consider adding retry logic: For flaky operations that might benefit from retries
8. Documentation: Add JSDoc comments to the new utility functions

---

🎭 Final Verdict

This is a solid refactoring that moves in the right direction toward using Playwright's native APIs. The code quality is generally good, and the approach is sound. However, the CI integration issues reported by maintainers need to be resolved before merging.

Recommendation: Request Changes - Address the critical CI issues and JSHandle lifecycle management before approving.

The refactoring shows good engineering practices and will improve test maintainability once the integration issues are resolved.

---

[claude]

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

---

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this pull request that refactors CF E2E Tests to use Playwright APIs. Here's my review progress:

Todo List:

• Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
• Review the overall refactoring approach and architecture
• Analyze new utility functions (expectPageEvalToPass, waitForFunction, etc.)
• Review test file changes (videoRoom.spec.ts)
• Check the new test file (utils.spec.ts)
• Investigate potential causes of CI failures mentioned in comments
• Review code quality, performance, and security considerations
• Provide comprehensive feedback and recommendations

Comprehensive Code Review

Overall Assessment: ✅ Good Refactoring with Some Concerns

This PR successfully refactors E2E tests from a custom promise-based approach to using Playwright's native utilities. The refactoring improves test reliability and maintainability, but there are several important issues to address.

---

🎯 Code Quality & Best Practices

✅ Strengths:

1. Good abstraction: The new utilities like expectPageEvalToPass() and waitForFunction() provide clean abstractions over Playwright APIs
2. Comprehensive testing: The new utils.spec.ts file includes thorough tests for the utility functions
3. Type safety: Proper TypeScript generic support in utilities like waitForFunction<TArg, TResult>()
4. Consistent patterns: The refactored tests follow consistent patterns for event handling and assertions

⚠️ Areas for Improvement:

1. Function Signature Inconsistency (utils.spec.ts:218-250)

// Inconsistent parameter structure
const result = await expectPageEvalToPass(page, {
  evaluateFn: () => true,
  messageAssert: 'pass - resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
  messageError: 'error - should resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
})

The test uses messageAssert and messageError parameters, but the actual function signature uses message and assertionFn. This suggests either incorrect tests or API inconsistency.

2. TODO Comments Need Attention (utils.ts:120, 142, 220, etc.)
Multiple functions are marked with TODO comments for removal. These should be cleaned up or the TODOs should be converted to tickets.

---

🐛 Potential Bugs & Issues

Critical Issues:

1. CI Failures Mentioned in Comments
The maintainers report that integrating these utilities into e2e-js caused all tests to fail. Based on my analysis, this could be due to:

• Assertion timing: The new expectPageEvalToPass function has different default timeouts (10 seconds) which might be causing test timing issues
• JSHandle serialization: The use of JSHandle<CallSession> (videoRoom.spec.ts:22) might not serialize properly across different test environments
• Default assertion behavior: The utilities include default assertions that might conflict with existing test patterns

2. Type Safety Issues (utils.ts:472-538)

export const dialAddress = <TReturn = any>(
  page: Page,
  params: DialAddressParams = {
    // ... params
  }
) => {
  // ... implementation
}

The TReturn = any default type defeats the purpose of generics and could hide type errors.

3. Error Handling Inconsistencies (utils.ts:1891-1898)

} catch (error) {
  if (options?.message) {
    throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${options.message} `)
  } else {
    throw new Error('waitForFunction:', error) // This will result in "[object Object]"
  }
}

The error handling doesn't properly format the error object when no custom message is provided.

Medium Priority Issues:

4. JSHandle Memory Leaks (videoRoom.spec.ts:22, 64-70)

let callObj = {} as JSHandle<CallSession>
// ... later
callObj = await waitForFunction(page, () => {
  if (window._callObj) {
    return window._callObj
  }
})

JSHandles need to be properly disposed to prevent memory leaks, but there's no cleanup in the test teardown.

5. Race Conditions (videoRoom.spec.ts:152-154)

await audioMuteSelf
await memberUpdatedMuted
await memberUpdatedMutedEvent

Sequential awaiting instead of Promise.all() might create race conditions where events fire before listeners are set up.

---

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Polling Intervals
The utilities default to long polling intervals (10 seconds) to avoid excessive polling, which is good. However:

• Some tests might need shorter intervals for responsiveness
• Consider making intervals more configurable per test case

2. Memory Usage

• JSHandle objects can consume significant memory if not disposed properly
• The refactored tests create more JSHandle objects than before

---

🔒 Security Concerns

Low Risk Overall - No significant security issues found:

• Environment variables are properly handled
• No sensitive data exposure in tests
• API tokens use proper encoding

---

📊 Test Coverage

✅ Strengths:

• Comprehensive unit tests for new utilities in utils.spec.ts
• Good coverage of edge cases (timeouts, errors, special characters)

⚠️ Gaps:

• Missing tests for waitForFunction (marked as TODO)
• Incomplete tests for expectPageEvalToPass error scenarios
• No integration tests showing the new pattern working with actual CF calls

---

🚀 Recommendations

High Priority:

1. Fix the CI integration issues: The utilities should work seamlessly when copied to e2e-js

   • Review timeout configurations and ensure they match expectations
   • Test the utilities in isolation in the e2e-js environment
   • Consider making default assertions optional

2. Address JSHandle lifecycle management:

   // Add proper cleanup
   test.afterEach(async () => {
     if (callObj) {
       await callObj.dispose()
     }
   })

3. Fix error handling in waitForFunction:

   } else {
     throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`)
   }

Medium Priority:

4. Improve type safety: Replace any types with proper generic constraints
5. Complete the TODO tests: Implement missing test cases for waitForFunction
6. Clean up unused utilities: Address all TODO comments about removing unused functions

Low Priority:

7. Consider adding retry logic: For flaky operations that might benefit from retries
8. Documentation: Add JSDoc comments to the new utility functions

---

🎭 Final Verdict

This is a solid refactoring that moves in the right direction toward using Playwright's native APIs. The code quality is generally good, and the approach is sound. However, the CI integration issues reported by maintainers need to be resolved before merging.

Recommendation: Request Changes - Address the critical CI issues and JSHandle lifecycle management before approving.

The refactoring shows good engineering practices and will improve test maintainability once the integration issues are resolved.

---

[claude]

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

---

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this pull request that refactors CF E2E Tests to use Playwright APIs. Here's my review progress:

Todo List:

• Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md)
• Review the overall refactoring approach and architecture
• Analyze new utility functions (expectPageEvalToPass, waitForFunction, etc.)
• Review test file changes (videoRoom.spec.ts)
• Check the new test file (utils.spec.ts)
• Investigate potential causes of CI failures mentioned in comments
• Review code quality, performance, and security considerations
• Provide comprehensive feedback and recommendations

Comprehensive Code Review

Overall Assessment: ✅ Good Refactoring with Some Concerns

This PR successfully refactors E2E tests from a custom promise-based approach to using Playwright's native utilities. The refactoring improves test reliability and maintainability, but there are several important issues to address.

---

🎯 Code Quality & Best Practices

✅ Strengths:

1. Good abstraction: The new utilities like expectPageEvalToPass() and waitForFunction() provide clean abstractions over Playwright APIs
2. Comprehensive testing: The new utils.spec.ts file includes thorough tests for the utility functions
3. Type safety: Proper TypeScript generic support in utilities like waitForFunction<TArg, TResult>()
4. Consistent patterns: The refactored tests follow consistent patterns for event handling and assertions

⚠️ Areas for Improvement:

1. Function Signature Inconsistency (utils.spec.ts:218-250)

// Inconsistent parameter structure
const result = await expectPageEvalToPass(page, {
  evaluateFn: () => true,
  messageAssert: 'pass - resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
  messageError: 'error - should resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
})

The test uses messageAssert and messageError parameters, but the actual function signature uses message and assertionFn. This suggests either incorrect tests or API inconsistency.

2. TODO Comments Need Attention (utils.ts:120, 142, 220, etc.)
Multiple functions are marked with TODO comments for removal. These should be cleaned up or the TODOs should be converted to tickets.

---

🐛 Potential Bugs & Issues

Critical Issues:

1. CI Failures Mentioned in Comments
The maintainers report that integrating these utilities into e2e-js caused all tests to fail. Based on my analysis, this could be due to:

• Assertion timing: The new expectPageEvalToPass function has different default timeouts (10 seconds) which might be causing test timing issues
• JSHandle serialization: The use of JSHandle<CallSession> (videoRoom.spec.ts:22) might not serialize properly across different test environments
• Default assertion behavior: The utilities include default assertions that might conflict with existing test patterns

2. Type Safety Issues (utils.ts:472-538)

export const dialAddress = <TReturn = any>(
  page: Page,
  params: DialAddressParams = {
    // ... params
  }
) => {
  // ... implementation
}

The TReturn = any default type defeats the purpose of generics and could hide type errors.

3. Error Handling Inconsistencies (utils.ts:1891-1898)

} catch (error) {
  if (options?.message) {
    throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${options.message} `)
  } else {
    throw new Error('waitForFunction:', error) // This will result in "[object Object]"
  }
}

The error handling doesn't properly format the error object when no custom message is provided.

Medium Priority Issues:

4. JSHandle Memory Leaks (videoRoom.spec.ts:22, 64-70)

let callObj = {} as JSHandle<CallSession>
// ... later
callObj = await waitForFunction(page, () => {
  if (window._callObj) {
    return window._callObj
  }
})

JSHandles need to be properly disposed to prevent memory leaks, but there's no cleanup in the test teardown.

5. Race Conditions (videoRoom.spec.ts:152-154)

await audioMuteSelf
await memberUpdatedMuted
await memberUpdatedMutedEvent

Sequential awaiting instead of Promise.all() might create race conditions where events fire before listeners are set up.

---

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Polling Intervals
The utilities default to long polling intervals (10 seconds) to avoid excessive polling, which is good. However:

• Some tests might need shorter intervals for responsiveness
• Consider making intervals more configurable per test case

2. Memory Usage

• JSHandle objects can consume significant memory if not disposed properly
• The refactored tests create more JSHandle objects than before

---

🔒 Security Concerns

Low Risk Overall - No significant security issues found:

• Environment variables are properly handled
• No sensitive data exposure in tests
• API tokens use proper encoding

---

📊 Test Coverage

✅ Strengths:

• Comprehensive unit tests for new utilities in utils.spec.ts
• Good coverage of edge cases (timeouts, errors, special characters)

⚠️ Gaps:

• Missing tests for waitForFunction (marked as TODO)
• Incomplete tests for expectPageEvalToPass error scenarios
• No integration tests showing the new pattern working with actual CF calls

---

🚀 Recommendations

High Priority:

1. Fix the CI integration issues: The utilities should work seamlessly when copied to e2e-js

   • Review timeout configurations and ensure they match expectations
   • Test the utilities in isolation in the e2e-js environment
   • Consider making default assertions optional

2. Address JSHandle lifecycle management:

   // Add proper cleanup
   test.afterEach(async () => {
     if (callObj) {
       await callObj.dispose()
     }
   })

3. Fix error handling in waitForFunction:

   } else {
     throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`)
   }

Medium Priority:

4. Improve type safety: Replace any types with proper generic constraints
5. Complete the TODO tests: Implement missing test cases for waitForFunction
6. Clean up unused utilities: Address all TODO comments about removing unused functions

Low Priority:

7. Consider adding retry logic: For flaky operations that might benefit from retries
8. Documentation: Add JSDoc comments to the new utility functions

---

🎭 Final Verdict

This is a solid refactoring that moves in the right direction toward using Playwright's native APIs. The code quality is generally good, and the approach is sound. However, the CI integration issues reported by maintainers need to be resolved before merging.

Recommendation: Request Changes - Address the critical CI issues and JSHandle lifecycle management before approving.

The refactoring shows good engineering practices and will improve test maintainability once the integration issues are resolved.

---

[claude]

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

---

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this pull request that refactors CF E2E Tests to use Playwright APIs. Here's my review progress:

Todo List:

• Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md) - No repo-specific guidelines found
• Review the overall refactoring approach and architecture
• Analyze new utility functions (expectPageEvalToPass, waitForFunction, etc.)
• Review test file changes (videoRoom.spec.ts)
• Check the new test file (utils.spec.ts)
• Investigate potential causes of CI failures mentioned in comments
• Review code quality, performance, and security considerations
• Provide comprehensive feedback and recommendations

Comprehensive Code Review

Overall Assessment: ✅ Good Refactoring with Some Concerns

This PR successfully refactors E2E tests from a custom promise-based approach to using Playwright's native utilities. The refactoring improves test reliability and maintainability, but there are several important issues to address.

---

🎯 Code Quality & Best Practices

✅ Strengths:

1. Good abstraction: The new utilities like expectPageEvalToPass() and waitForFunction() provide clean abstractions over Playwright APIs
2. Comprehensive testing: The new utils.spec.ts file includes thorough tests for the utility functions
3. Type safety: Proper TypeScript generic support in utilities like waitForFunction<TArg, TResult>()
4. Consistent patterns: The refactored tests follow consistent patterns for event handling and assertions

⚠️ Areas for Improvement:

1. Function Signature Inconsistency (utils.spec.ts:218-250)

// Inconsistent parameter structure
const result = await expectPageEvalToPass(page, {
  evaluateFn: () => true,
  messageAssert: 'pass - resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
  messageError: 'error - should resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
})

The test uses messageAssert and messageError parameters, but the actual function signature uses message and assertionFn. This suggests either incorrect tests or API inconsistency.

2. TODO Comments Need Attention (utils.ts:120, 142, 220, etc.)
Multiple functions are marked with TODO comments for removal. These should be cleaned up or the TODOs should be converted to tickets.

---

🐛 Potential Bugs & Issues

Critical Issues:

1. CI Failures Mentioned in Comments
The maintainers report that integrating these utilities into e2e-js caused all tests to fail. Based on my analysis, this could be due to:

• Assertion timing: The new expectPageEvalToPass function has different default timeouts (10 seconds) which might be causing test timing issues
• JSHandle serialization: The use of JSHandle<CallSession> (videoRoom.spec.ts:22) might not serialize properly across different test environments
• Default assertion behavior: The utilities include default assertions that might conflict with existing test patterns

2. Type Safety Issues (utils.ts:472-538)

export const dialAddress = <TReturn = any>(
  page: Page,
  params: DialAddressParams = {
    // ... params
  }
) => {
  // ... implementation
}

The TReturn = any default type defeats the purpose of generics and could hide type errors.

3. Error Handling Inconsistencies (utils.ts:1891-1898)

} catch (error) {
  if (options?.message) {
    throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${options.message} `)
  } else {
    throw new Error('waitForFunction:', error) // This will result in "[object Object]"
  }
}

The error handling doesn't properly format the error object when no custom message is provided.

Medium Priority Issues:

4. JSHandle Memory Leaks (videoRoom.spec.ts:22, 64-70)

let callObj = {} as JSHandle<CallSession>
// ... later
callObj = await waitForFunction(page, () => {
  if (window._callObj) {
    return window._callObj
  }
})

JSHandles need to be properly disposed to prevent memory leaks, but there's no cleanup in the test teardown.

5. Race Conditions (videoRoom.spec.ts:152-154)

await audioMuteSelf
await memberUpdatedMuted
await memberUpdatedMutedEvent

Sequential awaiting instead of Promise.all() might create race conditions where events fire before listeners are set up.

---

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Polling Intervals
The utilities default to long polling intervals (10 seconds) to avoid excessive polling, which is good. However:

• Some tests might need shorter intervals for responsiveness
• Consider making intervals more configurable per test case

2. Memory Usage

• JSHandle objects can consume significant memory if not disposed properly
• The refactored tests create more JSHandle objects than before

---

🔒 Security Concerns

Low Risk Overall - No significant security issues found:

• Environment variables are properly handled
• No sensitive data exposure in tests
• API tokens use proper encoding

---

📊 Test Coverage

✅ Strengths:

• Comprehensive unit tests for new utilities in utils.spec.ts
• Good coverage of edge cases (timeouts, errors, special characters)

⚠️ Gaps:

• Missing tests for waitForFunction (marked as TODO)
• Incomplete tests for expectPageEvalToPass error scenarios
• No integration tests showing the new pattern working with actual CF calls

---

🚀 Recommendations

High Priority:

1. Fix the CI integration issues: The utilities should work seamlessly when copied to e2e-js

   • Review timeout configurations and ensure they match expectations
   • Test the utilities in isolation in the e2e-js environment
   • Consider making default assertions optional

2. Address JSHandle lifecycle management:

   // Add proper cleanup
   test.afterEach(async () => {
     if (callObj) {
       await callObj.dispose()
     }
   })

3. Fix error handling in waitForFunction:

   } else {
     throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`)
   }

Medium Priority:

4. Improve type safety: Replace any types with proper generic constraints
5. Complete the TODO tests: Implement missing test cases for waitForFunction
6. Clean up unused utilities: Address all TODO comments about removing unused functions

Low Priority:

7. Consider adding retry logic: For flaky operations that might benefit from retries
8. Documentation: Add JSDoc comments to the new utility functions

---

🎭 Final Verdict

This is a solid refactoring that moves in the right direction toward using Playwright's native APIs. The code quality is generally good, and the approach is sound. However, the CI integration issues reported by maintainers need to be resolved before merging.

Recommendation: Request Changes - Address the critical CI issues and JSHandle lifecycle management before approving.

The refactoring shows good engineering practices and will improve test maintainability once the integration issues are resolved.

---

[claude]

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

---

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this pull request that refactors CF E2E Tests to use Playwright APIs. Here's my review progress:

Todo List:

• Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md) - No repo-specific guidelines found
• Review the overall refactoring approach and architecture
• Analyze new utility functions (expectPageEvalToPass, waitForFunction, etc.)
• Review test file changes (videoRoom.spec.ts)
• Check the new test file (utils.spec.ts)
• Investigate potential causes of CI failures mentioned in comments
• Review code quality, performance, and security considerations
• Provide comprehensive feedback and recommendations

Comprehensive Code Review

Overall Assessment: ✅ Good Refactoring with Some Concerns

This PR successfully refactors E2E tests from a custom promise-based approach to using Playwright's native utilities. The refactoring improves test reliability and maintainability, but there are several important issues to address.

---

🎯 Code Quality & Best Practices

✅ Strengths:

1. Good abstraction: The new utilities like expectPageEvalToPass() and waitForFunction() provide clean abstractions over Playwright APIs
2. Comprehensive testing: The new utils.spec.ts file includes thorough tests for the utility functions
3. Type safety: Proper TypeScript generic support in utilities like waitForFunction<TArg, TResult>()
4. Consistent patterns: The refactored tests follow consistent patterns for event handling and assertions

⚠️ Areas for Improvement:

1. Function Signature Inconsistency (utils.spec.ts:218-250)

// Inconsistent parameter structure
const result = await expectPageEvalToPass(page, {
  evaluateFn: () => true,
  messageAssert: 'pass - resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
  messageError: 'error - should resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
})

The test uses messageAssert and messageError parameters, but the actual function signature uses message and assertionFn. This suggests either incorrect tests or API inconsistency.

2. TODO Comments Need Attention (utils.ts:120, 142, 220, etc.)
Multiple functions are marked with TODO comments for removal. These should be cleaned up or the TODOs should be converted to tickets.

---

🐛 Potential Bugs & Issues

Critical Issues:

1. CI Failures Mentioned in Comments
The maintainers report that integrating these utilities into e2e-js caused all tests to fail. Based on my analysis, this could be due to:

• Assertion timing: The new expectPageEvalToPass function has different default timeouts (10 seconds) which might be causing test timing issues
• JSHandle serialization: The use of JSHandle<CallSession> (videoRoom.spec.ts:22) might not serialize properly across different test environments
• Default assertion behavior: The utilities include default assertions that might conflict with existing test patterns

2. Type Safety Issues (utils.ts:472-538)

export const dialAddress = <TReturn = any>(
  page: Page,
  params: DialAddressParams = {
    // ... params
  }
) => {
  // ... implementation
}

The TReturn = any default type defeats the purpose of generics and could hide type errors.

3. Error Handling Inconsistencies (utils.ts:1891-1898)

} catch (error) {
  if (options?.message) {
    throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${options.message} `)
  } else {
    throw new Error('waitForFunction:', error) // This will result in "[object Object]"
  }
}

The error handling doesn't properly format the error object when no custom message is provided.

Medium Priority Issues:

4. JSHandle Memory Leaks (videoRoom.spec.ts:22, 64-70)

let callObj = {} as JSHandle<CallSession>
// ... later
callObj = await waitForFunction(page, () => {
  if (window._callObj) {
    return window._callObj
  }
})

JSHandles need to be properly disposed to prevent memory leaks, but there's no cleanup in the test teardown.

5. Race Conditions (videoRoom.spec.ts:152-154)

await audioMuteSelf
await memberUpdatedMuted
await memberUpdatedMutedEvent

Sequential awaiting instead of Promise.all() might create race conditions where events fire before listeners are set up.

---

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Polling Intervals
The utilities default to long polling intervals (10 seconds) to avoid excessive polling, which is good. However:

• Some tests might need shorter intervals for responsiveness
• Consider making intervals more configurable per test case

2. Memory Usage

• JSHandle objects can consume significant memory if not disposed properly
• The refactored tests create more JSHandle objects than before

---

🔒 Security Concerns

Low Risk Overall - No significant security issues found:

• Environment variables are properly handled
• No sensitive data exposure in tests
• API tokens use proper encoding

---

📊 Test Coverage

✅ Strengths:

• Comprehensive unit tests for new utilities in utils.spec.ts
• Good coverage of edge cases (timeouts, errors, special characters)

⚠️ Gaps:

• Missing tests for waitForFunction (marked as TODO)
• Incomplete tests for expectPageEvalToPass error scenarios
• No integration tests showing the new pattern working with actual CF calls

---

🚀 Recommendations

High Priority:

1. Fix the CI integration issues: The utilities should work seamlessly when copied to e2e-js

   • Review timeout configurations and ensure they match expectations
   • Test the utilities in isolation in the e2e-js environment
   • Consider making default assertions optional

2. Address JSHandle lifecycle management:

   // Add proper cleanup
   test.afterEach(async () => {
     if (callObj) {
       await callObj.dispose()
     }
   })

3. Fix error handling in waitForFunction:

   } else {
     throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`)
   }

Medium Priority:

4. Improve type safety: Replace any types with proper generic constraints
5. Complete the TODO tests: Implement missing test cases for waitForFunction
6. Clean up unused utilities: Address all TODO comments about removing unused functions

Low Priority:

7. Consider adding retry logic: For flaky operations that might benefit from retries
8. Documentation: Add JSDoc comments to the new utility functions

---

🎭 Final Verdict

This is a solid refactoring that moves in the right direction toward using Playwright's native APIs. The code quality is generally good, and the approach is sound. However, the CI integration issues reported by maintainers need to be resolved before merging.

Recommendation: Request Changes - Address the critical CI issues and JSHandle lifecycle management before approving.

The refactoring shows good engineering practices and will improve test maintainability once the integration issues are resolved.

---

[claude]

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

---

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this pull request that refactors CF E2E Tests to use Playwright APIs. Here's my review progress:

Todo List:

• Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md) - No repo-specific guidelines found
• Review the overall refactoring approach and architecture
• Analyze new utility functions (expectPageEvalToPass, waitForFunction, etc.)
• Review test file changes (videoRoom.spec.ts)
• Check the new test file (utils.spec.ts)
• Investigate potential causes of CI failures mentioned in comments
• Review code quality, performance, and security considerations
• Provide comprehensive feedback and recommendations

Comprehensive Code Review

Overall Assessment: ✅ Good Refactoring with Some Concerns

This PR successfully refactors E2E tests from a custom promise-based approach to using Playwright's native utilities. The refactoring improves test reliability and maintainability, but there are several important issues to address.

---

🎯 Code Quality & Best Practices

✅ Strengths:

1. Good abstraction: The new utilities like expectPageEvalToPass() and waitForFunction() provide clean abstractions over Playwright APIs
2. Comprehensive testing: The new utils.spec.ts file includes thorough tests for the utility functions
3. Type safety: Proper TypeScript generic support in utilities like waitForFunction<TArg, TResult>()
4. Consistent patterns: The refactored tests follow consistent patterns for event handling and assertions

⚠️ Areas for Improvement:

1. Function Signature Inconsistency (utils.spec.ts:218-250)

// Inconsistent parameter structure
const result = await expectPageEvalToPass(page, {
  evaluateFn: () => true,
  messageAssert: 'pass - resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
  messageError: 'error - should resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
})

The test uses messageAssert and messageError parameters, but the actual function signature uses message and assertionFn. This suggests either incorrect tests or API inconsistency.

2. TODO Comments Need Attention (utils.ts:120, 142, 220, etc.)
Multiple functions are marked with TODO comments for removal. These should be cleaned up or the TODOs should be converted to tickets.

---

🐛 Potential Bugs & Issues

Critical Issues:

1. CI Failures Mentioned in Comments
The maintainers report that integrating these utilities into e2e-js caused all tests to fail. Based on my analysis, this could be due to:

• Assertion timing: The new expectPageEvalToPass function has different default timeouts (10 seconds) which might be causing test timing issues
• JSHandle serialization: The use of JSHandle<CallSession> (videoRoom.spec.ts:22) might not serialize properly across different test environments
• Default assertion behavior: The utilities include default assertions that might conflict with existing test patterns

2. Type Safety Issues (utils.ts:472-538)

export const dialAddress = <TReturn = any>(
  page: Page,
  params: DialAddressParams = {
    // ... params
  }
) => {
  // ... implementation
}

The TReturn = any default type defeats the purpose of generics and could hide type errors.

3. Error Handling Inconsistencies (utils.ts:1891-1898)

} catch (error) {
  if (options?.message) {
    throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${options.message} `)
  } else {
    throw new Error('waitForFunction:', error) // This will result in "[object Object]"
  }
}

The error handling doesn't properly format the error object when no custom message is provided.

Medium Priority Issues:

4. JSHandle Memory Leaks (videoRoom.spec.ts:22, 64-70)

let callObj = {} as JSHandle<CallSession>
// ... later
callObj = await waitForFunction(page, () => {
  if (window._callObj) {
    return window._callObj
  }
})

JSHandles need to be properly disposed to prevent memory leaks, but there's no cleanup in the test teardown.

5. Race Conditions (videoRoom.spec.ts:152-154)

await audioMuteSelf
await memberUpdatedMuted
await memberUpdatedMutedEvent

Sequential awaiting instead of Promise.all() might create race conditions where events fire before listeners are set up.

---

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Polling Intervals
The utilities default to long polling intervals (10 seconds) to avoid excessive polling, which is good. However:

• Some tests might need shorter intervals for responsiveness
• Consider making intervals more configurable per test case

2. Memory Usage

• JSHandle objects can consume significant memory if not disposed properly
• The refactored tests create more JSHandle objects than before

---

🔒 Security Concerns

Low Risk Overall - No significant security issues found:

• Environment variables are properly handled
• No sensitive data exposure in tests
• API tokens use proper encoding

---

📊 Test Coverage

✅ Strengths:

• Comprehensive unit tests for new utilities in utils.spec.ts
• Good coverage of edge cases (timeouts, errors, special characters)

⚠️ Gaps:

• Missing tests for waitForFunction (marked as TODO)
• Incomplete tests for expectPageEvalToPass error scenarios
• No integration tests showing the new pattern working with actual CF calls

---

🚀 Recommendations

High Priority:

1. Fix the CI integration issues: The utilities should work seamlessly when copied to e2e-js

   • Review timeout configurations and ensure they match expectations
   • Test the utilities in isolation in the e2e-js environment
   • Consider making default assertions optional

2. Address JSHandle lifecycle management:

   // Add proper cleanup
   test.afterEach(async () => {
     if (callObj) {
       await callObj.dispose()
     }
   })

3. Fix error handling in waitForFunction:

   } else {
     throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`)
   }

Medium Priority:

4. Improve type safety: Replace any types with proper generic constraints
5. Complete the TODO tests: Implement missing test cases for waitForFunction
6. Clean up unused utilities: Address all TODO comments about removing unused functions

Low Priority:

7. Consider adding retry logic: For flaky operations that might benefit from retries
8. Documentation: Add JSDoc comments to the new utility functions

---

🎭 Final Verdict

This is a solid refactoring that moves in the right direction toward using Playwright's native APIs. The code quality is generally good, and the approach is sound. However, the CI integration issues reported by maintainers need to be resolved before merging.

Recommendation: Request Changes - Address the critical CI issues and JSHandle lifecycle management before approving.

The refactoring shows good engineering practices and will improve test maintainability once the integration issues are resolved.

---

[claude]

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

---

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this pull request that refactors CF E2E Tests to use Playwright APIs. Here's my review progress:

Todo List:

• Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md) - No repo-specific guidelines found
• Review the overall refactoring approach and architecture
• Analyze new utility functions (expectPageEvalToPass, waitForFunction, etc.)
• Review test file changes (videoRoom.spec.ts)
• Check the new test file (utils.spec.ts)
• Investigate potential causes of CI failures mentioned in comments
• Review code quality, performance, and security considerations
• Provide comprehensive feedback and recommendations

Comprehensive Code Review

Overall Assessment: ✅ Good Refactoring with Some Concerns

This PR successfully refactors E2E tests from a custom promise-based approach to using Playwright's native utilities. The refactoring improves test reliability and maintainability, but there are several important issues to address.

---

🎯 Code Quality & Best Practices

✅ Strengths:

1. Good abstraction: The new utilities like expectPageEvalToPass() and waitForFunction() provide clean abstractions over Playwright APIs
2. Comprehensive testing: The new utils.spec.ts file includes thorough tests for the utility functions
3. Type safety: Proper TypeScript generic support in utilities like waitForFunction<TArg, TResult>()
4. Consistent patterns: The refactored tests follow consistent patterns for event handling and assertions

⚠️ Areas for Improvement:

1. Function Signature Inconsistency (utils.spec.ts:218-250)

// Inconsistent parameter structure
const result = await expectPageEvalToPass(page, {
  evaluateFn: () => true,
  messageAssert: 'pass - resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
  messageError: 'error - should resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
})

The test uses messageAssert and messageError parameters, but the actual function signature uses message and assertionFn. This suggests either incorrect tests or API inconsistency.

2. TODO Comments Need Attention (utils.ts:120, 142, 220, etc.)
Multiple functions are marked with TODO comments for removal. These should be cleaned up or the TODOs should be converted to tickets.

---

🐛 Potential Bugs & Issues

Critical Issues:

1. CI Failures Mentioned in Comments
The maintainers report that integrating these utilities into e2e-js caused all tests to fail. Based on my analysis, this could be due to:

• Assertion timing: The new expectPageEvalToPass function has different default timeouts (10 seconds) which might be causing test timing issues
• JSHandle serialization: The use of JSHandle<CallSession> (videoRoom.spec.ts:22) might not serialize properly across different test environments
• Default assertion behavior: The utilities include default assertions that might conflict with existing test patterns

2. Type Safety Issues (utils.ts:472-538)

export const dialAddress = <TReturn = any>(
  page: Page,
  params: DialAddressParams = {
    // ... params
  }
) => {
  // ... implementation
}

The TReturn = any default type defeats the purpose of generics and could hide type errors.

3. Error Handling Inconsistencies (utils.ts:1891-1898)

} catch (error) {
  if (options?.message) {
    throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${options.message} `)
  } else {
    throw new Error('waitForFunction:', error) // This will result in "[object Object]"
  }
}

The error handling doesn't properly format the error object when no custom message is provided.

Medium Priority Issues:

4. JSHandle Memory Leaks (videoRoom.spec.ts:22, 64-70)

let callObj = {} as JSHandle<CallSession>
// ... later
callObj = await waitForFunction(page, () => {
  if (window._callObj) {
    return window._callObj
  }
})

JSHandles need to be properly disposed to prevent memory leaks, but there's no cleanup in the test teardown.

5. Race Conditions (videoRoom.spec.ts:152-154)

await audioMuteSelf
await memberUpdatedMuted
await memberUpdatedMutedEvent

Sequential awaiting instead of Promise.all() might create race conditions where events fire before listeners are set up.

---

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Polling Intervals
The utilities default to long polling intervals (10 seconds) to avoid excessive polling, which is good. However:

• Some tests might need shorter intervals for responsiveness
• Consider making intervals more configurable per test case

2. Memory Usage

• JSHandle objects can consume significant memory if not disposed properly
• The refactored tests create more JSHandle objects than before

---

🔒 Security Concerns

Low Risk Overall - No significant security issues found:

• Environment variables are properly handled
• No sensitive data exposure in tests
• API tokens use proper encoding

---

📊 Test Coverage

✅ Strengths:

• Comprehensive unit tests for new utilities in utils.spec.ts
• Good coverage of edge cases (timeouts, errors, special characters)

⚠️ Gaps:

• Missing tests for waitForFunction (marked as TODO)
• Incomplete tests for expectPageEvalToPass error scenarios
• No integration tests showing the new pattern working with actual CF calls

---

🚀 Recommendations

High Priority:

1. Fix the CI integration issues: The utilities should work seamlessly when copied to e2e-js

   • Review timeout configurations and ensure they match expectations
   • Test the utilities in isolation in the e2e-js environment
   • Consider making default assertions optional

2. Address JSHandle lifecycle management:

   // Add proper cleanup
   test.afterEach(async () => {
     if (callObj) {
       await callObj.dispose()
     }
   })

3. Fix error handling in waitForFunction:

   } else {
     throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`)
   }

Medium Priority:

4. Improve type safety: Replace any types with proper generic constraints
5. Complete the TODO tests: Implement missing test cases for waitForFunction
6. Clean up unused utilities: Address all TODO comments about removing unused functions

Low Priority:

7. Consider adding retry logic: For flaky operations that might benefit from retries
8. Documentation: Add JSDoc comments to the new utility functions

---

🎭 Final Verdict

This is a solid refactoring that moves in the right direction toward using Playwright's native APIs. The code quality is generally good, and the approach is sound. However, the CI integration issues reported by maintainers need to be resolved before merging.

Recommendation: Request Changes - Address the critical CI issues and JSHandle lifecycle management before approving.

The refactoring shows good engineering practices and will improve test maintainability once the integration issues are resolved.

---

[claude]

Claude finished @LittorWired's task —— View job

---

PR Review Progress

Reviewing this pull request that refactors CF E2E Tests to use Playwright APIs. Here's my review progress:

Todo List:

• Read repository guidelines (CLAUDE.md) - No repo-specific guidelines found
• Review the overall refactoring approach and architecture
• Analyze new utility functions (expectPageEvalToPass, waitForFunction, etc.)
• Review test file changes (videoRoom.spec.ts)
• Check the new test file (utils.spec.ts)
• Investigate potential causes of CI failures mentioned in comments
• Review code quality, performance, and security considerations
• Provide comprehensive feedback and recommendations

Comprehensive Code Review

Overall Assessment: ✅ Good Refactoring with Some Concerns

This PR successfully refactors E2E tests from a custom promise-based approach to using Playwright's native utilities. The refactoring improves test reliability and maintainability, but there are several important issues to address.

---

🎯 Code Quality & Best Practices

✅ Strengths:

1. Good abstraction: The new utilities like expectPageEvalToPass() and waitForFunction() provide clean abstractions over Playwright APIs
2. Comprehensive testing: The new utils.spec.ts file includes thorough tests for the utility functions
3. Type safety: Proper TypeScript generic support in utilities like waitForFunction<TArg, TResult>()
4. Consistent patterns: The refactored tests follow consistent patterns for event handling and assertions

⚠️ Areas for Improvement:

1. Function Signature Inconsistency (utils.spec.ts:218-250)

// Inconsistent parameter structure
const result = await expectPageEvalToPass(page, {
  evaluateFn: () => true,
  messageAssert: 'pass - resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
  messageError: 'error - should resolve when the function returns a truthy value', // Different from main function
})

The test uses messageAssert and messageError parameters, but the actual function signature uses message and assertionFn. This suggests either incorrect tests or API inconsistency.

2. TODO Comments Need Attention (utils.ts:120, 142, 220, etc.)
Multiple functions are marked with TODO comments for removal. These should be cleaned up or the TODOs should be converted to tickets.

---

🐛 Potential Bugs & Issues

Critical Issues:

1. CI Failures Mentioned in Comments
The maintainers report that integrating these utilities into e2e-js caused all tests to fail. Based on my analysis, this could be due to:

• Assertion timing: The new expectPageEvalToPass function has different default timeouts (10 seconds) which might be causing test timing issues
• JSHandle serialization: The use of JSHandle<CallSession> (videoRoom.spec.ts:22) might not serialize properly across different test environments
• Default assertion behavior: The utilities include default assertions that might conflict with existing test patterns

2. Type Safety Issues (utils.ts:472-538)

export const dialAddress = <TReturn = any>(
  page: Page,
  params: DialAddressParams = {
    // ... params
  }
) => {
  // ... implementation
}

The TReturn = any default type defeats the purpose of generics and could hide type errors.

3. Error Handling Inconsistencies (utils.ts:1891-1898)

} catch (error) {
  if (options?.message) {
    throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${options.message} `)
  } else {
    throw new Error('waitForFunction:', error) // This will result in "[object Object]"
  }
}

The error handling doesn't properly format the error object when no custom message is provided.

Medium Priority Issues:

4. JSHandle Memory Leaks (videoRoom.spec.ts:22, 64-70)

let callObj = {} as JSHandle<CallSession>
// ... later
callObj = await waitForFunction(page, () => {
  if (window._callObj) {
    return window._callObj
  }
})

JSHandles need to be properly disposed to prevent memory leaks, but there's no cleanup in the test teardown.

5. Race Conditions (videoRoom.spec.ts:152-154)

await audioMuteSelf
await memberUpdatedMuted
await memberUpdatedMutedEvent

Sequential awaiting instead of Promise.all() might create race conditions where events fire before listeners are set up.

---

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Polling Intervals
The utilities default to long polling intervals (10 seconds) to avoid excessive polling, which is good. However:

• Some tests might need shorter intervals for responsiveness
• Consider making intervals more configurable per test case

2. Memory Usage

• JSHandle objects can consume significant memory if not disposed properly
• The refactored tests create more JSHandle objects than before

---

🔒 Security Concerns

Low Risk Overall - No significant security issues found:

• Environment variables are properly handled
• No sensitive data exposure in tests
• API tokens use proper encoding

---

📊 Test Coverage

✅ Strengths:

• Comprehensive unit tests for new utilities in utils.spec.ts
• Good coverage of edge cases (timeouts, errors, special characters)

⚠️ Gaps:

• Missing tests for waitForFunction (marked as TODO)
• Incomplete tests for expectPageEvalToPass error scenarios
• No integration tests showing the new pattern working with actual CF calls

---

🚀 Recommendations

High Priority:

1. Fix the CI integration issues: The utilities should work seamlessly when copied to e2e-js

   • Review timeout configurations and ensure they match expectations
   • Test the utilities in isolation in the e2e-js environment
   • Consider making default assertions optional

2. Address JSHandle lifecycle management:

   // Add proper cleanup
   test.afterEach(async () => {
     if (callObj) {
       await callObj.dispose()
     }
   })

3. Fix error handling in waitForFunction:

   } else {
     throw new Error(`waitForFunction: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`)
   }

Medium Priority:

4. Improve type safety: Replace any types with proper generic constraints
5. Complete the TODO tests: Implement missing test cases for waitForFunction
6. Clean up unused utilities: Address all TODO comments about removing unused functions

Low Priority:

7. Consider adding retry logic: For flaky operations that might benefit from retries
8. Documentation: Add JSDoc comments to the new utility functions

---

🎭 Final Verdict

This is a solid refactoring that moves in the right direction toward using Playwright's native APIs. The code quality is generally good, and the approach is sound. However, the CI integration issues reported by maintainers need to be resolved before merging.

Recommendation: Request Changes - Address the critical CI issues and JSHandle lifecycle management before approving.

The refactoring shows good engineering practices and will improve test maintainability once the integration issues are resolved.

---