Validate usfm versification

[Enkidu93]

Fixes #318

Partially addresses sillsdev/serval#768

---

This change is 

[Enkidu93]

Still need to add tests.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 89.07563% with 26 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 72.57%. Comparing base (53b745a) to head (3ff1c87).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...chine/Corpora/UsfmVersificationMismatchDetector.cs	92.15%	8 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
...ra/ParatextProjectVersificationMismatchDetector.cs	74.19%	8 Missing ⚠️
...L.Machine/Corpora/ZipParatextProjectFileHandler.cs	88.23%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...ileParatextProjectVersificationMismatchDetector.cs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...L.Machine/Corpora/ZipParatextProjectTextUpdater.cs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...ZipParatextProjectVersificationMismatchDetector.cs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...lysis/ZipParatextProjectQuoteConventionDetector.cs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #353      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.38%   72.57%   +0.19%     
==========================================
  Files         417      423       +6     
  Lines       35632    35798     +166     
  Branches     4929     4949      +20     
==========================================
+ Hits        25793    25982     +189     
+ Misses       8744     8718      -26     
- Partials     1095     1098       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Enkidu93]

Tests have been added. I'm really excited to get this in 🎉.

[ddaspit]

@ddaspit reviewed 16 of 22 files at r1, 2 of 3 files at r2, 7 of 10 files at r3, 3 of 4 files at r4, 1 of 1 files at r5, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 4 unresolved discussions (waiting on @Enkidu93)

---

src/SIL.Machine/Corpora/UsfmVersificationMismatchDetector.cs line 108 at r4 (raw file):

                if (
                    Type == UsfmVersificationMismatchType.MissingVerseSegment
                    && VerseRef.TryParse(

Why are you using TryParse here and not the constructor?

---

src/SIL.Machine/Corpora/IParatextProjectFileHandler.cs line 5 at r1 (raw file):

namespace SIL.Machine.Corpora
{
    public interface IParatextProjectFileHandler

Shouldn't we also use this interface in ParatextProjectSettingsParserBase?

---

src/SIL.Machine/Corpora/ParatextProjectVersificationMismatchDetector.cs line 8 at r1 (raw file):

namespace SIL.Machine.Corpora
{
    public abstract class ParatextProjectVersificationMismatchDetector

By convention, ABCs are suffixed with Base.

---

src/SIL.Machine/Corpora/ParatextProjectTermsParserBase.cs line 299 at r1 (raw file):

        }

        private Stream Open(string fileName) => _paratextProjectFileHandler.Open(fileName);

This indirection is unnecessary. I would just call _paratextProjectFileHandler directly.