feat: Command argument split #3456
Open
+39
−1
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@Rienkim I think we are gonna do named args instead of that format, if you are up for it if you update this pr to support named args I will review and merge it |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
$ARGUMENTSindexing and splitting for/commands#2199 had a merge conflict that was not resolved, so I am submitting a new PR with the merge conflict resolved.$ARGUMENTS[n+],$ARGUMENTS[n++]becasue they can be replaced by$ARGUMENTS[n:n+1],$ARGUMENTS[n:n+2].$ARGUMENTSas before.