Skip to content

feat: postgrest 13 add maxaffected in client libraries #619

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 16 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

avallete
Copy link
Member

@avallete avallete commented May 19, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Implement the maxAffected postgrest 13 feature at the client level
  • Add tests, introduce a more generic way to handle Prefer header, can be refactor at other places in other PR
  • Refactor the custom made headers handling approach to the standard Headers API
  • Bump minimal node version to the latest LTS v18 (which as support for Headers)

avallete added 2 commits May 19, 2025 09:26
…tgrest-v13-integration' into avallete/psql-372-postgrest-add-maxaffected-in-client-libraries
avallete and others added 3 commits May 27, 2025 13:55
@avallete avallete force-pushed the avallete/psql-372-postgrest-add-maxaffected-in-client-libraries branch from 1904574 to 9ef7ee0 Compare May 27, 2025 12:14
…tgrest-v13-integration' into avallete/psql-372-postgrest-add-maxaffected-in-client-libraries
@soedirgo
Copy link
Member

soedirgo commented Jul 2, 2025

Approved #618, pls tag me or mark this as ready for review once it is 🙏

@avallete avallete changed the base branch from avallete/psql-436-feedback-request-postgrest-js-and-postgrest-v13-integration to master July 2, 2025 15:55
@avallete avallete marked this pull request as ready for review July 2, 2025 16:02
@avallete
Copy link
Member Author

avallete commented Jul 4, 2025

cc @soedirgo coverall is giving me hard time for this one, but it's ready for review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants