-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 213
Handle "-internal-import-bridging-header" #1993
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handle "-internal-import-bridging-header" #1993
Conversation
Driver part of rdar://74011750.
@swift-ci please test |
self.importBridgingHeaderAsInternal = importBridgingHeaderOption.option == .internalImportBridgingHeader | ||
} else { | ||
self.originalObjCHeaderFile = nil | ||
self.importBridgingHeaderAsInternal = false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is not quite correct. I think it maybe need to be internal if library evolution is enabled.
The special case that falls here is that the current module doesn't have a bridging header but there is dependency swift binary module that has bridging header, thus scanner can create a chained bridging for current module. In this case, there isn't a bridging header import flag that indicates if current module does internal import or not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think I understand how to construct this special case. In the place where the driver used to always generate -import-pch
for the chained header, it now checks whether the bridging header is internal and will pass the new -internal-import-pch
instead (which treats the PCH as internal-only). Is that not sufficient?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A swift testcase for this is: https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/blob/main/test/ScanDependencies/bridging-header-autochaining.swift#L51-L55
Requirement is:
- Module has no bridging header
- Binary module dependency has bridging header
- Enable auto chaining.
In this case, driver invocation will not have -*import-bridging-header
, swift-driver needs to figure out which -import-pch
flag flavor to pass the PCH flag to swift-frontend.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When the binary module dependency has an internal bridging header (the new thing), it's not recorded that it has a bridging header at all, so there is no chaining. No?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In my example, internal bridging header is not using internal bridging header, but the legacy bridging header.
@swift-ci please test Windows |
The bridging header is effectively imported as a "public" import. This new option makes it an "internal" import, so that entities accessible via the bridging header cannot be part of public API.
Driver part of rdar://74011750.