swiftlang · AnthonyLatsis · Jan 12, 2023
diff --git a/proposal-templates/0000-swift-template.md b/proposal-templates/0000-swift-template.md
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 
 * Implementation: [apple/swift#NNNNN](https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/NNNNN) or [apple/swift-evolution-staging#NNNNN](https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution-staging/pull/NNNNN)
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/), [Additional Commentary](https://forums.swift.org/)
-* Bugs: [SR-NNNN](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-NNNN), [SR-MMMM](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-MMMM)
+* Bugs: [apple/swift#NNNNN](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/NNNNN), [apple/swift#MMMMM](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/MMMMM)
 * Previous Revision: [1](https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/...commit-ID.../proposals/NNNN-filename.md)
 * Previous Proposal: [SE-XXXX](XXXX-filename.md)
 

diff --git a/proposal-templates/0000-swiftpm-template.md b/proposal-templates/0000-swiftpm-template.md
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 
 * Implementation: [apple/swift-package-manager#NNNNN](https://github.com/apple/swift-package-manager/pull/NNNNN)
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/), [Additional Commentary](https://forums.swift.org/)
-* Bugs: [SR-NNNN](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-NNNN), [SR-MMMM](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-MMMM)
+* Bugs: [apple/swift-package-manager#NNNNN](https://github.com/apple/swift-package-manager/issues/NNNNN), [apple/swift-package-manager#MMMMM](https://github.com/apple/swift-package-manager/issues/MMMMM)
 * Previous Revision: [1](https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/...commit-ID.../proposals/NNNN-filename.md)
 * Previous Proposal: [SE-XXXX](XXXX-filename.md)
 

diff --git a/proposals/0001-keywords-as-argument-labels.md b/proposals/0001-keywords-as-argument-labels.md
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 * Proposal: [SE-0001](0001-keywords-as-argument-labels.md)
 * Author: [Doug Gregor](https://github.com/DougGregor)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 2.2)**
-* Bug: [SR-344](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-344)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#42966](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/42966)
 
 ## Introduction
 

diff --git a/proposals/0007-remove-c-style-for-loops.md b/proposals/0007-remove-c-style-for-loops.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Doug Gregor](https://github.com/DougGregor)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0007-remove-c-style-for-loops-with-conditions-and-incrementers/512)
-* Bugs: [SR-226](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-226), [SR-227](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-227)
+* Bugs: [apple/swift#42848](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/42848), [apple/swift#42849](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/42849)
 
 ## Introduction
 

diff --git a/proposals/0008-lazy-flatmap-for-optionals.md b/proposals/0008-lazy-flatmap-for-optionals.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Doug Gregor](https://github.com/DougGregor)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0008-add-a-lazy-flatmap-for-sequences-of-optionals/748)
-* Bug: [SR-361](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-361)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#42981](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/42981)
 
 ## Introduction ##
 

diff --git a/proposals/0011-replace-typealias-associated.md b/proposals/0011-replace-typealias-associated.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Doug Gregor](https://github.com/DougGregor)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 2.2)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0011-replace-typealias-keyword-with-associatedtype-for-associated-type-declarations/990)
-* Bug: [SR-511](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-511)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#43128](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43128)
 
 
 ## Introduction

diff --git a/proposals/0014-constrained-AnySequence.md b/proposals/0014-constrained-AnySequence.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Doug Gregor](https://github.com/DougGregor)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 2.2)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0014-constraining-anysequence-init/924)
-* Bug: [SR-474](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-474)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#43091](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43091)
 
 
 ## Introduction

diff --git a/proposals/0016-initializers-for-converting-unsafe-pointers-to-ints.md b/proposals/0016-initializers-for-converting-unsafe-pointers-to-ints.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](https://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0016-adding-initializers-to-int-and-uint-to-convert-from-unsafepointer-and-unsafemutablepointer/2005)
-* Bug: [SR-1115](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1115)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#43728](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43728)
 * Previous Revision: [1](https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/ae2d7c24fff7cbdff754d9a4339e4fb02df5c690/proposals/0016-initializers-for-converting-unsafe-pointers-to-ints.md)
 
 ## Introduction

diff --git a/proposals/0017-convert-unmanaged-to-use-unsafepointer.md b/proposals/0017-convert-unmanaged-to-use-unsafepointer.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](https://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0017-change-unmanaged-to-use-unsafepointer/2461)
-* Bug: [SR-1485](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1485)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#44094](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/44094)
 
 ## Introduction
 

diff --git a/proposals/0019-package-manager-testing.md b/proposals/0019-package-manager-testing.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Rick Ballard](https://github.com/rballard)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0019-swift-testing-package-manager/1155)
-* Bug: [SR-592](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-592)
+* Bug: [apple/swift-package-manager#5324](https://github.com/apple/swift-package-manager/issues/5324)
 
 ## Introduction
 

diff --git a/proposals/0025-scoped-access-level.md b/proposals/0025-scoped-access-level.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Review Manager: [Doug Gregor](http://github.com/DougGregor)
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/se-0025-scoped-access-level-next-steps/1797/131)
-* Bug: [SR-1275](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1275)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#43883](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43883)
 * Previous revision: [1](https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/e4328889a9643100177aef19f6f428855c5d0cf2/proposals/0025-scoped-access-level.md)
 
 ## Introduction

diff --git a/proposals/0028-modernizing-debug-identifiers.md b/proposals/0028-modernizing-debug-identifiers.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](https://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 2.2)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0028-modernizing-swifts-debugging-identifiers-line-etc/1303)
-* Bug: [SR-669](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-669)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#43284](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43284)
 
 ## Introduction
 
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ Additional points to be considered by the Swift team for inclusion:
 
 ## Possible Future Extensions
 
-[SR-198](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-198) requested the coalescing of existing identifiers. A structured `#sourcelocation` identifier could be added as a follow-on if and when the Swift team decides to tackle a standardized source location type, which would provide individual field or keyword access.
+[apple/swift#42820](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/42820) requested the coalescing of existing identifiers. A structured `#sourcelocation` identifier could be added as a follow-on if and when the Swift team decides to tackle a standardized source location type, which would provide individual field or keyword access.
 
 In support of summaries, Remy Demerest writes, "[I] love the idea that source location would be one object that you can print to get the full story while still retaining the possibility to use each individual components as needed, which is probably the rarer case. I never find myself wanting only some of properties and usually don't include them simply because it takes longer to write the format properly, if I can get them all in one go it's certainly a win."
 

diff --git a/proposals/0032-sequencetype-find.md b/proposals/0032-sequencetype-find.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](https://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0032-add-find-method-to-sequence/2462)
-* Bug: [SR-1519](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1519)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#44128](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/44128)
 * Previous Revisions: [1](https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/d709546002e1636a10350d14da84eb9e554c3aac/proposals/0032-sequencetype-find.md)
 
 ## Introduction

diff --git a/proposals/0034-disambiguating-line.md b/proposals/0034-disambiguating-line.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](https://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0034-disambiguating-line-control-statements-from-debugging-identifiers/1614)
-* Bug: [SR-840](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-840)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#43452](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43452)
 
 
 ## Introduction

diff --git a/proposals/0035-limit-inout-capture.md b/proposals/0035-limit-inout-capture.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](https://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0035-limiting-inout-capture-to-noescape-contexts/1544)
-* Bug: [SR-807](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-807)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#43419](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43419)
 
 
 ## Introduction

diff --git a/proposals/0036-enum-dot.md b/proposals/0036-enum-dot.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Doug Gregor](https://github.com/DougGregor)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0036-requiring-leading-dot-prefixes-for-enum-instance-member-implementations/2196)
-* Bug: [SR-1236](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1236)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#43844](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43844)
 
 
 ## Introduction

diff --git a/proposals/0037-clarify-comments-and-operators.md b/proposals/0037-clarify-comments-and-operators.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](http://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0037-clarify-interaction-between-comments-operators/1833)
-* Bug: [SR-960](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-960)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#43572](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43572)
 
 
 ## Introduction
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ A draft implementation is [available here](https://github.com/apple/swift/compar
 
 At the moment, comments next to operators are usually treated as
 non-whitespace for the purpose of [determining whether an operator is prefix/postfix/binary](https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Swift/Conceptual/Swift_Programming_Language/LexicalStructure.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40014097-CH30-ID418),
-meaning that this fails to compile ([SR-186](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-186)):
+meaning that this fails to compile ([apple/swift#42808](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/42808)):
 
 ```
 if /* comment */!foo { ... }

diff --git a/proposals/0038-swiftpm-c-language-targets.md b/proposals/0038-swiftpm-c-language-targets.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Rick Ballard](https://github.com/rballard)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0038-package-manager-c-language-target-support/1569)
-* Bug: [SR-821](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-821)
+* Bug: [apple/swift-package-manager#5314](https://github.com/apple/swift-package-manager/issues/5314)
 
 
 ## Introduction

diff --git a/proposals/0039-playgroundliterals.md b/proposals/0039-playgroundliterals.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](https://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0039-modernizing-playground-literals/1746)
-* Bug: [SR-917](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-917)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#43529](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43529)
 
 ## Introduction
 

diff --git a/proposals/0042-flatten-method-types.md b/proposals/0042-flatten-method-types.md
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 * Status: **Rejected**
 * Decision Notes: [Original acceptance](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0042-flattening-the-function-type-of-unapplied-method-references/1926). The proposal was not implemented in time for Swift 3, and is now source-breaking.
 
-* Bug: [SR-1051](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1051)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#43663](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43663)
 
 ## Introduction
 

diff --git a/proposals/0044-import-as-member.md b/proposals/0044-import-as-member.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Review Manager: [Doug Gregor](https://github.com/DougGregor)
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0044-import-as-member/1929)
-* Bug: [SR-1053](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1053)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#43665](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43665)
 
 ## Introduction
 

diff --git a/proposals/0045-scan-takewhile-dropwhile.md b/proposals/0045-scan-takewhile-dropwhile.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](http://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3.1)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-with-modifications-se-0045-add-scan-prefix-while-drop-while-and-unfold-to-the-stdlib/2466)
-* Bug: [SR-1516](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1516)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#44125](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/44125)
 * Previous Revisions: [1](https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/b39d653f7e3d5e982b562664343f26c826652291/proposals/0045-scan-takewhile-dropwhile.md), [2](https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/baec22a8a5ddaa0407086380da32b5cad2144800/proposals/0045-scan-takewhile-dropwhile.md), [3](https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/d709546002e1636a10350d14da84eb9e554c3aac/proposals/0045-scan-takewhile-dropwhile.md)
 
 ## Introduction

diff --git a/proposals/0046-first-label.md b/proposals/0046-first-label.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](https://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0046-establish-consistent-label-behavior-across-all-parameters-including-first-labels/1834)
-* Bug: [SR-961](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-961)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#43573](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43573)
 
 ## Introduction
 We propose to normalize the first parameter declaration in methods 

diff --git a/proposals/0047-nonvoid-warn.md b/proposals/0047-nonvoid-warn.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](https://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-with-revision-se-0047-defaulting-non-void-functions-so-they-warn-on-unused-results/1927)
-* Bug: [SR-1052](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1052)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#43664](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43664)
 
 
 ## Introduction

diff --git a/proposals/0049-noescape-autoclosure-type-attrs.md b/proposals/0049-noescape-autoclosure-type-attrs.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Doug Gregor](https://github.com/DougGregor)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0049-move-noescape-and-autoclosure-to-be-type-attributes/2194)
-* Bug: [SR-1235](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1235)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#43843](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43843)
 
 ## Introduction
 

diff --git a/proposals/0060-defaulted-parameter-order.md b/proposals/0060-defaulted-parameter-order.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](http://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0060-enforcing-order-of-defaulted-parameters/2573)
-* Bug: [SR-1489](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1489)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#44098](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/44098)
 
 ## Introduction
 

diff --git a/proposals/0061-autoreleasepool-signature.md b/proposals/0061-autoreleasepool-signature.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Dave Abrahams](http://github.com/dabrahams)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0061-add-generic-result-and-error-handling-to-autoreleasepool/2425)
-* Bugs: [SR-842](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-842), [SR-1394](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1394)
+* Bugs: [apple/swift#43454](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43454), [apple/swift#44003](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/44003)
 
 ## Introduction
 
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ No impact expected.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
-The [original request, SR-842](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-842) only
+The [original request, apple/swift#43454](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43454), only
 suggested adding `throws`, but Dmitri Gribenko pointed out that adding a generic
 return type would be better.
 

diff --git a/proposals/0062-objc-keypaths.md b/proposals/0062-objc-keypaths.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Doug Gregor](https://github.com/DougGregor)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0062-referencing-objective-c-key-paths/2198)
-* Bug: [SR-1237](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1237)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#43845](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43845)
 
 ## Introduction
 

diff --git a/proposals/0064-property-selectors.md b/proposals/0064-property-selectors.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Doug Gregor](https://github.com/DougGregor)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0064-referencing-the-objective-c-selector-of-property-getters-and-setters/2199)
-* Bug: [SR-1239](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1239)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#43847](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43847)
 
 ## Introduction
 

diff --git a/proposals/0068-universal-self.md b/proposals/0068-universal-self.md
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 5.1)**
 * Implementation: [apple/swift#22863](https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/22863)
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-with-modification-se-0068-expanding-swift-self-to-class-members-and-value-types/2373)
-* Bug: [SR-1340](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1340)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#43948](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/43948)
 * Previous Revisions: [1](https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/bcd77b028cb2fc9f07472532b120e927c7e48b34/proposals/0068-universal-self.md), [2](https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/13d9771e86c5639b8320f05e5daa31a62bac0f07/proposals/0068-universal-self.md)
 
 ## Introduction

diff --git a/proposals/0070-optional-requirements.md b/proposals/0070-optional-requirements.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](http://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0070-make-optional-requirements-objective-c-only/2426)
-* Bug: [SR-1395](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1395)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#44004](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/44004)
 
 ## Introduction
 

diff --git a/proposals/0074-binary-search.md b/proposals/0074-binary-search.md
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Swift does not offer any way to efficiently search sorted collections.
 This proposal seeks to add a few different functions that implement the binary search algorithm.
 
 - Swift-evolution thread: [\[Proposal\] Add Binary Search functions to SequenceType](https://forums.swift.org/t/proposal-add-binary-search-functions-to-sequencetype/1827)
-- JIRA: [Swift/SR-368](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-368)
+- JIRA: [apple/swift#42987](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/42987)
 
 ## Motivation
 

diff --git a/proposals/0075-import-test.md b/proposals/0075-import-test.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](http://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 4.1)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0075-adding-a-build-configuration-import-test/2683)
-* Bug: [SR-1560](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1560)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#44169](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/44169)
 
 ## Introduction
 

diff --git a/proposals/0076-copying-to-unsafe-mutable-pointer-with-unsafe-pointer-source.md b/proposals/0076-copying-to-unsafe-mutable-pointer-with-unsafe-pointer-source.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](http://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-with-revision-se-0076-add-overrides-taking-an-unsafepointer-source-to-non-destructive-copying-methods-on-unsafemutablepointer/2577)
-* Bug: [SR-1490](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1490)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#44099](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/44099)
 
 ## Introduction
 

diff --git a/proposals/0080-failable-numeric-initializers.md b/proposals/0080-failable-numeric-initializers.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](http://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3.1)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-with-revision-se-0080-failable-numeric-conversion-initializers/2578)
-* Bug: [SR-1491](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1491)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#44100](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/44100)
 
 ## Introduction
 

diff --git a/proposals/0081-move-where-expression.md b/proposals/0081-move-where-expression.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](http://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0081-move-where-clause-to-end-of-declaration/2685)
-* Bug: [SR-1561](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1561)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#44170](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/44170)
 
 ## Introduction
 

diff --git a/proposals/0089-rename-string-reflection-init.md b/proposals/0089-rename-string-reflection-init.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](http://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0089-renaming-string-init-t-t/3097)
-* Bug: [SR-1881](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1881)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#44490](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/44490)
 * Previous Revisions: [1](https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/40aecf3647c19ae37730e39aa9e54b67fcc2be86/proposals/0089-rename-string-reflection-init.md)
 
 ## Introduction

diff --git a/proposals/0091-improving-operators-in-protocols.md b/proposals/0091-improving-operators-in-protocols.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](http://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0091-improving-operator-requirements-in-protocols/3390)
-* Bug: [SR-2073](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-2073)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#44682](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/44682)
 * Previous Revision: [1](https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/eaab20ed34df1dc8ba8aa07e49abc8c5fa216f3e/proposals/0091-improving-operators-in-protocols.md)
 
 ## Introduction

diff --git a/proposals/0092-typealiases-in-protocols.md b/proposals/0092-typealiases-in-protocols.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 * Review Manager: [Chris Lattner](http://github.com/lattner)
 * Status: **Implemented (Swift 3)**
 * Decision Notes: [Rationale](https://forums.swift.org/t/accepted-se-0092-typealiases-in-protocols-and-protocol-extensions/2639)
-* Bug: [SR-1539](https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1539)
+* Bug: [apple/swift#44148](https://github.com/apple/swift/issues/44148)
 
 ## Introduction