MIR: include a mention that d/copyright needs to cover vendored content #351
+4
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
seb128
requested review from
MylesJP,
cpaelzer,
didrocks,
joalif,
pushkarnk,
setharnold and
slyon
as code owners
cpaelzer
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2025
Collaborator
cpaelzer
left a comment
cpaelzer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like that it was added to the reporters template to make them aware early on instead of as a late back and forth on review.
+1 and thanks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The topic came as part of the archive admin rejection on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2133149 where a package vendored didn't have its debian/copyright updated to cover the vendored crates. It has been observed that a part of the packages that did vendor their dependencies in recent cycles as part of the MIR process didn't update the debian/copyright. Adding an item to the vendoring checklist well help communicating the expectation.