Reference test cases #258
Open
Reference test cases #258
+14
−4
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
afs
added
needs discussion
This was referenced Dec 4, 2025
pchampin
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2025
Contributor
|
The current practice for RECs is not to publish a NOTE for the implementation reports -- most of the time they are hosted on github pages, so the proposal is inline with that. I would suggest to also add a Respec header pointing to the implementation report: |
hartig
approved these changes
Dec 8, 2025
Co-authored-by: Pierre-Antoine Champin <[email protected]>
Contributor
Author
What will be the location of the implementation report? For now, I'd like to finish this PR: currently this has a placeholder of: "rdf-tests" is a CG whereas there will be a "maintenance and new features" WG. See also |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We need to decide whether we need a "RDF 1.2 Test Cases document" similar to NOTE RDF 1.1 Test Cases document or whether some text in RDF Concepts is sufficient.
The other RDF 1.2 documents have a test suite link in their document details.
Preview | Diff