-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 785
chore: use local package for scripts #11572
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for rspack ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR standardizes the use of local packages in script execution commands by replacing pnpx
with pnpm exec
and ensuring dependencies are explicitly listed in package.json files.
- Replaces
pnpx
withpnpm exec
for consistent local package execution - Adds missing dependencies to package.json files to support the local execution approach
- Reorganizes dependency order in package.json for consistency
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 5 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
Show a summary per file
File | Description |
---|---|
x.mjs | Updates rspack and jest command execution to use pnpm exec |
website/package.json | Adds case-police and cspell as local dependencies and updates script commands |
package.json | Adds check-dependency-version-consistency and reorganizes dependencies |
lint-staged.config.mjs | Updates taplo execution to use pnpm exec |
.husky/pre-commit | Updates lint-staged execution to use pnpm exec |
Files not reviewed (1)
- pnpm-lock.yaml: Language not supported
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
📦 Binary Size-limit
🎉 Size decreased by 43.50KB from 47.31MB to 47.26MB (⬇️0.09%) |
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #11572 will not alter performanceComparing 🎉 Hooray!
|
Summary
ref #11520 (comment)
Related links
Checklist