-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
Provided intial OSGi support for WebJars #58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Sandared
wants to merge
1
commit into
webjars:master
Choose a base branch
from
Sandared:initial-osgi-support
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've tried to make bumping these easy by creating the unsnapshot plugin so I wonder if we can create a similar plugin that OSGI-ifies the version rather than having to edit it in multiple places.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've attached a piece of code that takes a maven version and tries to transform it into an OSGi version. In the worst case this will always return a version in the form
0.0.0.timestampif the given maven version is completly malformed.I have no experience with creating Maven plugins, so maybe you could just take this code an turn it into one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jamesward is there anything else you need for this plugin?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've created a repo for the plugin:
https://github.com/jamesward/osgi-version-maven-plugin
But the output isn't quite what I'd expect. For example:
https://github.com/jamesward/osgi-version-maven-plugin/blob/master/src/test/java/com/jamesward/osgiversion/UnsnapshotMojoTest.java#L32
The output of that one is
1.2.3.-beta1-.2(the dashes are preserved. Anyhow, let's collaborate over on that repo and get it fixed up and released.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The "-beta1-.2" part is regarded as the qualifier part of the OSGi version, which may contain dashes, but if those are not important, then I can alter the code to remove them. In OSGi they have no effect on the resolver, I think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it'd look better without the dashes in the qualifier, at least without leading and trailing dashes. Want to send a PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I sent you a PR