Revise privacy considerations #890
Conversation
* Add a new introduction * Add Fingerprinting subsection, revise and expand content * Add Execution Time Analysis subsection * Fix autolink Fix #886
|
Gentle ping @sandandsnow. We’d like to receive your review for the general direction of this PR by our TPAC meeting webmachinelearning/meetings#35 An alternative to this proposal is a minimal change as outlined in #886 (comment) The group is eager to hear the Privacy WG preference. If you’re indifferent wrt this I’d be inclined to propose the minimal change instead. Thank you for your advice. |
|
@anssiko, thank you for the reminder. I had missed the ask to review the PR. |
|
I have this on our TPAC agenda now but if we're able to resolve this sooner the better and we can free time for other privacy topics. |
reillyeon
left a comment
reillyeon
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good, just some grammar nits.
Co-authored-by: Reilly Grant <[email protected]>
|
Thanks for your review and suggestions, @reillyeon. @sandandsnow, if you feel further discussion is required, we have allocated a slot for privacy topics at TPAC webmachinelearning/meetings#35 within the 10 November 2025 15:30-16:45 JST timebox for a higher bandwidth discussion. |
Fix #886
Preview | Diff