Bump types-rs to 0.2.3

[gabrielbosio]

No description provided.

[xJonathanLEI]

I'm not sure about this. What's the rationale for the bump? Is there a security or other critical issues with <0.2.3? As a library crate we should stay as forgiving as possible in terms of crate version ranges.

[gabrielbosio]

@xJonathanLEI I understand that it makes sense to keep types-rs in 0.2.0 but in this case we had to fix a performance regression related to Pedersen hashing (~120%) in 0.2 which introduced a breaking change. Given the context we had to make an exception regarding semver, that's why these changes were introduced in 0.2.3.

[dorimedini-starkware]

@gabrielbosio @xJonathanLEI I am fine with merging this or closing this without merging, as long as we have some 0.2.x version of types-rs we can compile with the 0.13.0 lambdaworks