Skip to content

Conversation

@dlovell
Copy link
Collaborator

@dlovell dlovell commented Sep 24, 2025

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 24, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 88.54167% with 66 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ython/xorq/common/utils/feast_replication_utils.py 83.85% 31 Missing ⚠️
python/xorq/common/utils/feast_utils.py 90.61% 23 Missing ⚠️
.../xorq/common/utils/tests/feast/test_feast_utils.py 76.00% 12 Missing ⚠️
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
python/xorq/common/utils/tests/feast/conftest.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
.../utils/tests/feast/test_feast_replication_utils.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
.../xorq/common/utils/tests/feast/test_feast_utils.py 76.00% <76.00%> (ø)
python/xorq/common/utils/feast_utils.py 90.61% <90.61%> (ø)
...ython/xorq/common/utils/feast_replication_utils.py 83.85% <83.85%> (ø)

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Sep 24, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #1305 will degrade performances by 36.8%

Comparing feat/feast-utils (b7e8b5c) with main (05cdebd)

Summary

❌ 1 regression
✅ 3 untouched

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
test_into_backend_cache 228.3 ms 361.2 ms -36.8%

@dlovell dlovell force-pushed the feat/feast-utils branch 3 times, most recently from 7db54f8 to 0c48e85 Compare September 25, 2025 14:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant