-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
community 2025: final pass for review #18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! Note that I asked @djacu to revert the changes to the foundation questions
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just one thing stands out to me, but regarding small tweaks I believe you are better informed than me.
- Official support or services | ||
- A maintained Long-Term-Support release | ||
- prompt: Which areas should the NixOS Foundation prioritise funds for? | ||
- prompt: Which areas should the NixOS Foundation prioritise excess funds for? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think when we reviewed this initially we wanted to add "scarcity" to improve the quality of the answers
- prompt: Which areas should the NixOS Foundation prioritise excess funds for? | |
- prompt: Which five areas should the NixOS Foundation prioritise excess funds for? |
Open to other ideas or leaving as is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The foundation has asked that we leave the wording as it was originally submitted. @infinisil it's your call
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about we make this a ranking instead. Don't think we need to limit the number then, and we get more usable data.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good. I'll update the PR and get this into the limesurvey today.
At the request of @infinisil
- The ability to deduct donations from tax | ||
- More options for ear-marking donations | ||
- Official support or services | ||
- A maintained Long-Term-Support release |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@djacu Just noticed that these stayed in the survey, too late to change now I guess
@roberth @leona I cannot add you as reviewers but prompts were modified that you care about. Please take a look.