-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
community 2025: final pass for review #18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
25707f1
6ab4099
1b3cbe0
48b31f2
a3e5fd1
ad9ffa8
afaad63
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ questions: | |||||
- Information security / cybersecurity (client-facing) | ||||||
- Blockchain / cryptocurrency / web3 | ||||||
- Other | ||||||
- prompt: Can we reach out to you for upcoming sponsorship efforts? | ||||||
- prompt: Can we reach out to you about sponsoring the project in the future? | ||||||
type: single | ||||||
choices: | ||||||
- Yes | ||||||
|
@@ -186,11 +186,13 @@ questions: | |||||
- prompt: If you use NixOS stable, how was your experience upgrading to the new stable version (25.05)? | ||||||
type: single | ||||||
choices: | ||||||
- 1 - I had severe issues and could not make the upgrade. | ||||||
- 2 - I had severe issues but figured it out after some time. | ||||||
- 3 - I had moderate issues. | ||||||
- 4 - I had minor issues. | ||||||
- 5 - I had no issues. | ||||||
- I had severe issues and could not make the upgrade. | ||||||
- I had severe issues but figured it out after some time. | ||||||
- I had moderate issues. | ||||||
- I had minor issues. | ||||||
- I had no issues. | ||||||
- I have not upgraded. | ||||||
- I did not know there was a new stable release. | ||||||
- prompt: Which of these best describe your involvement with the Nix ecosystem? | ||||||
type: multiple | ||||||
choices: | ||||||
|
@@ -238,7 +240,7 @@ questions: | |||||
- I teach others about Nix/Nixpkgs/NixOS. | ||||||
- I understand a portion of the ecosystem enough to make architectural choices (e.g. one of the language frameworks, stdenv, modules, Nix experimental features, etc). | ||||||
- I have read some portion of the Nix source code and understand it. | ||||||
- I completely understand all Nix error messages. | ||||||
- I completely understand all Nix error messages. | ||||||
- prompt: > | ||||||
Did you hear about Nix or NixOS first? | ||||||
If you heard about both at the same time, select which one first made you interested in the Nix ecosystem. | ||||||
|
@@ -341,6 +343,14 @@ questions: | |||||
- I used another package manager (e.g. Homebrew, APT) | ||||||
- I built Nix from source | ||||||
- Other | ||||||
- prompt: Which of these do you use? | ||||||
type: multiple | ||||||
- Nix | ||||||
- Tvix | ||||||
- Lix | ||||||
- Determinate Nix | ||||||
- Snix | ||||||
- None | ||||||
- prompt: On what types of systems or infrastructure do you use Nix? | ||||||
type: multiple | ||||||
choices: | ||||||
|
@@ -379,6 +389,7 @@ questions: | |||||
choices: | ||||||
- I don't use Nix | ||||||
- NixOS configurations | ||||||
- Other | ||||||
# Taken from Stack Overflow survey, ordered alphabetically. | ||||||
- APL | ||||||
- Ada | ||||||
|
@@ -589,10 +600,8 @@ questions: | |||||
- Donor perks (e.g. recognition on website, Discourse badges, swag, exclusive access) | ||||||
- The ability to deduct donations from tax | ||||||
- More options for ear-marking donations | ||||||
- Official support or services | ||||||
- A maintained Long-Term-Support release | ||||||
- prompt: Which areas should the NixOS Foundation prioritise funds for? | ||||||
type: multiple | ||||||
- prompt: Which areas should the NixOS Foundation prioritise excess funds for? | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think when we reviewed this initially we wanted to add "scarcity" to improve the quality of the answers
Suggested change
Open to other ideas or leaving as is. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The foundation has asked that we leave the wording as it was originally submitted. @infinisil it's your call There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. How about we make this a ranking instead. Don't think we need to limit the number then, and we get more usable data. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Sounds good. I'll update the PR and get this into the limesurvey today. |
||||||
type: ranking | ||||||
choices: | ||||||
- Governance (e.g. policies, guidelines, processes) | ||||||
- Community health (e.g. conflict resolution, moderation) | ||||||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@djacu Just noticed that these stayed in the survey, too late to change now I guess