Skip to content

Conversation

@szokeasaurusrex
Copy link
Member

The sentence, as written, is incomplete. I asked Cursor to infer what the rest of the sentence should be; this is what it proposed, giving the following justification:

Looking at the implementation, I can see that:

  1. The SourceBundleWriter has a finish method (line 1414) that:

    • Takes self by value (consumes the writer)
    • Writes the manifest
    • Finalizes the underlying ZipWriter
  2. There's no Drop implementation for SourceBundleWriter

  3. The example code explicitly shows calling bundle.finish()?; to properly flush the bundle

The sentence, as written, is incomplete. I asked Cursor to infer what the rest of the sentence should be; this is what it proposed, giving the following justification:

> Looking at the implementation, I can see that:
>
> 1. The `SourceBundleWriter` has a `finish` method (line 1414) that:
>    - Takes `self` by value (consumes the writer)
>    - Writes the manifest
>    - Finalizes the underlying `ZipWriter`
>
> 2. There's **no `Drop` implementation** for `SourceBundleWriter`
>
> 3. The example code explicitly shows calling `bundle.finish()?;` to properly flush the bundle
@szokeasaurusrex
Copy link
Member Author

@jan-auer, the original author, confirmed in Slack that this is likely what he meant

@szokeasaurusrex szokeasaurusrex merged commit 5b67665 into master Nov 6, 2025
15 of 16 checks passed
@szokeasaurusrex szokeasaurusrex deleted the szokeasaurusrex/finish-comment branch November 6, 2025 09:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants