Skip to content

Conversation

@PhilipDeegan
Copy link
Member

@PhilipDeegan PhilipDeegan commented Mar 30, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Refined GPU memory reporting to optimize performance. The display of GPU memory usage metrics now benefits from a more efficient processing approach, potentially speeding up diagnostics without altering the functionality’s output.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 30, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the declaration of the function print_gpu_mem_used in two header files. In both inc/mkn/gpu/cuda.hpp and inc/mkn/gpu/rocm.hpp, the function signature has been modified to include the inline specifier. The change does not affect the function’s implementation or its underlying logic. In the case of rocm.hpp, the alteration occurs within the MKN_GPU_NS namespace.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
inc/mkn/gpu/cuda.hpp, inc/mkn/gpu/rocm.hpp Updated the function declaration of print_gpu_mem_used to include the inline keyword. In rocm.hpp, this update occurs within a namespace.

Poem

I'm a little rabbit, hopping in the code,
Inline magic now lightens the load.
Carrots of performance, crisp and clear,
Each function call now draws near.
With a twitch of my nose and a joyful cheer,
I celebrate this change with endless cheer! 🥕✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e5723d2 and 8067111.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • inc/mkn/gpu/cuda.hpp (1 hunks)
  • inc/mkn/gpu/rocm.hpp (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
inc/mkn/gpu/cuda.hpp (1)

343-343: Adding inline specifier is a good optimization hint.

Adding the inline specifier to print_gpu_mem_used() is a good practice for header-defined functions. While the function would likely be implicitly inlined by modern compilers since it's defined in a header file, explicitly marking it as inline makes the intention clear and ensures consistent behavior across different compiler versions.

inc/mkn/gpu/rocm.hpp (1)

343-343: Adding inline specifier is appropriate and maintains consistency.

The addition of the inline specifier here matches the change made to the CUDA version, maintaining consistency between the two implementations. This is good practice for header-defined functions and communicates clear intent to the compiler for potential optimization.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@PhilipDeegan PhilipDeegan merged commit 3e7997c into master Apr 2, 2025
1 check passed
@PhilipDeegan PhilipDeegan deleted the next branch April 2, 2025 16:41
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Apr 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants