Skip to content

Conversation

mhaessig
Copy link
Contributor

@mhaessig mhaessig commented Sep 4, 2025

TestCompileTaskTimeout.java employs a timeout to test that methods compiled faster than a specified CompileTaskTimeout. However, it does not make use of the jtreg timeout factor, which lead to #26963 increasing the timeout to 2 s. This PR remedies this, by using the timeout factor and reducing the default timeout to 500 ms.

Testing:

  • Github Actions
  • tier1, tier2 linux-x64-debug, linux-x64, linux-aarch64-debug, linux-aarch64

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8366775: TestCompileTaskTimeout should use timeoutFactor (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27094/head:pull/27094
$ git checkout pull/27094

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27094
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27094/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27094

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27094

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27094.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 4, 2025

👋 Welcome back mhaessig! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 4, 2025

@mhaessig This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8366775: TestCompileTaskTimeout should use timeoutFactor

Reviewed-by: chagedorn, rcastanedalo, mbaesken

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 67 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 4, 2025

@mhaessig The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added hotspot-compiler [email protected] rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 4, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 4, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@chhagedorn chhagedorn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks reasonable, thanks for adjusting it again!

Copy link
Contributor

@robcasloz robcasloz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! Please check with the PPC port maintainers (and perhaps the maintainers of RISC-V, s390, and ARM32?) that this works in their environment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 4, 2025
@mhaessig
Copy link
Contributor Author

mhaessig commented Sep 4, 2025

@MBaesken, could you please have a look, since you filed the issue? Is the reduced default a problem on your side?

@MBaesken
Copy link
Member

MBaesken commented Sep 8, 2025

Is the reduced default a problem on your side?
I added the PR to our build/test queue. The reduced default should be okay for us.

@MBaesken
Copy link
Member

MBaesken commented Sep 9, 2025

Looks good, the adjustments seem to work for us.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler [email protected] ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants